ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,734 Are you busy
166,637 Re: Forum
160,788 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 63 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#100703 - 12/12/06 10:06 AM Line/Load  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
I see enclousures with a single circuit breaker mounted in them and the handle operates left to right instead of up and down. There are no markings in the panel to indicate line and load. If the contractor installs the load conductors on the top side of the breaker and the line conductors on the bottom of the circuit breaker is this a violation? Manufacturer is silent on this matter. I asked the contractor to use a magic marker to label line and load and he agreed.


George Little

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#100704 - 12/12/06 02:06 PM Re: Line/Load  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,060
Estero,Fl,usa
Sounds like a good example of cooperation between inspector and contractor.
I don't know what you could cite as a violation


Greg Fretwell

#100705 - 12/12/06 05:49 PM Re: Line/Load  
Alan Nadon  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
Elkhart, IN. USA
Check 408.16(F) back fed devices.
Switches and breakers used as switches must also be indicating, i.e. off /on if not verticle. 404.7
I think these references are the ones you need.
Alan--
Just reread the question...same references plus UL listing.
Is he using a double pole breaker with line on one terminal and load connected to the other half ?????
When the breaker is off it is still energized. Why does he use an enclosure instead of just wrapping tape around the bomb he has made.
Alan--


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.

#100706 - 12/12/06 07:57 PM Re: Line/Load  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Alan I don't think that you have in your mind what George is describing.

I do not think we are talking about a breaker in a panel.

I believe he asking about a single breaker enclosure that is sometimes used in place of a fused disconnect.

George If I am correct about the installation the EC can feed bottom or top unless the breaker is marked line and load.

If you had asked me I would have written line and load on it but I really do not believe you could require me to.

On the job I was at today I have a 1600 amp single breaker in a large enclosure, I fed the bottom of the breaker as the feed is coming from a transformer (The supply conductors where down low already)

In this case I specified bottom feed when we ordered it. The only change that I can see from the top feed one I have is the direction the current sensor is facing on the neutral for the GFP.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#100707 - 12/12/06 09:03 PM Re: Line/Load  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Alan- Bob is correct, the CB is being used like you'd use a safety switch. There were no Line/Load designations. The terminals were on the top and bottom of the CB and the handle operated horizontally. I asked the contractor to label Line/Load with a marker, which he did. If I were the installer, I'd mark it for my own benefit because you'd probable not remember Line/Load when you went back to it in the future. The panel was flush in the wall and there was no way of knowing which way the conductors were coming from. As it turned out the top side of the breaker was being used as the Load and usually the top side is the Line.


George Little

#100708 - 12/12/06 09:15 PM Re: Line/Load  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Quote
If I were the installer, I'd mark it for my own benefit because you'd probable not remember Line/Load when you went back to it in the future.


Great point, honestly the 1600 I described above is not readily apparent either by looking at the conduits or by the construction of the unit.

I have to order phenolic labels for the job, may be I will have a couple of line and load ones made to mark it.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#100709 - 12/17/06 11:44 AM Re: Line/Load  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
I've seen this discussion somewhere else, possibly in the IAEI magazine. The consensus of the discussion was that if there were no markings on the breaker or the enclosure, the line could be connected to either end. This is in agreement with what is in the UL White Book (DIVQ) last sentence of the Installation paragraph "Line and load markings on a circuit breaker are intended to limit connections thereto as marked."

Asking the installer to identify which end is the line connection is an excellant idea and sounds to me like a possible proposal for the 2011 NEC.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#100710 - 12/19/06 06:58 PM Re: Line/Load  
Steve T  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 306
Oak Park, IL, USA
If you are going to work on it, shut it off and put a tester on it. If you are not working on it, when would knowing line or load be critical?



Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7924 MB (Peak: 0.9530 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 13:20:12 UTC