ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#100677 - 12/10/06 08:42 AM Accessibility of GEC connection
Alan Nadon Offline
Member
Registered: 03/10/05
Posts: 399
Loc: Elkhart, IN. USA
We are still learning about concrete encased electrodes in the Mid-West.
On metal frame buildings the #4 Cu or a piece of rebar is brought up and connected to the steel. Then they want to sheet rock the area for an office.
Does the connection to the steel have to be accessible ? Any suggestions ?
Alan--
_________________________
Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#100678 - 12/10/06 09:11 AM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
Luketrician Offline
Member
Registered: 07/08/06
Posts: 272
Loc: Sale Creek, TN USA
Hey Alan, have you looked at 250.68 (A)? Maybe you could bond the steel at another location so that it would'nt be covered up behind the sheetrock?
_________________________
Luke Clarke
Electrical Planner for TVA.

Top
#100679 - 12/10/06 09:14 AM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
earlydean Offline
Member
Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 751
Loc: Griswold, CT, USA
In the past, we have placed two-gang tile rings in strategic places (similiar to telephone rough-in) to provide access to GEC connections to the GE on GWB (sheetrocked) walls. Finish work requires a two gang blank cover.
_________________________
Earl
Top
#100680 - 12/10/06 09:42 AM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
We do the same out here in California (Uferland) as Earlydean suggests.
In residential work, the electrode is normally brought up in an outside wall as close to the service location as is possible.
Mounting the ring facing out with a weatherproof plate rather than in through the drywall can save some headaches when nobody "wants that cover on my beautiful drywall" or goes and installs closed-back cabinetry in front of it.

[This message has been edited by electure (edited 12-10-2006).]
Top
#100681 - 12/10/06 11:05 AM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
gfretwell Online   content


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#100682 - 12/10/06 05:48 PM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
highground Offline
Member
Registered: 11/14/04
Posts: 53
Loc: Chama, NM
Here in New Mexico we have to leave the connection available, I do so with a two gang p-ring and blank cover.

As of a couple months ago I also have to supplement the ufer with a rod, does that make any sense?
Top
#100683 - 12/10/06 10:18 PM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
macmikeman Offline
Member
Registered: 07/16/02
Posts: 717
Loc: Honolulu, Hawaii
Highground, that would only "make sense" if the ground rod was allready there. Cause if it was allready there, then you would have to include it.
Top
#100684 - 12/10/06 10:46 PM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
gfretwell Online   content


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
The only advantage I see to adding a rod is it gives the Telco and CableCo a place to bond their Dmark.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#100685 - 12/12/06 08:42 AM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
Alan Nadon Offline
Member
Registered: 03/10/05
Posts: 399
Loc: Elkhart, IN. USA
Thanks everyone.
250.68(A) is what brought this up.
The plaster rings seem to be the direction to go to.
As an aside, some electricians around here are driving the ground rods inside the basement because of the copper thieves.
Alan--
_________________________
Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.
Top
#100686 - 12/12/06 11:07 AM Re: Accessibility of GEC connection
tdhorne Offline
Member
Registered: 03/22/01
Posts: 345
Loc: Maryland, USA
Alan
You must have a much harder working class of thieves there than I have ever met. The idea that such a low life would do the work needed to get the rod back out of the earth is one I had never considered. Or do they just steal the GEC and leave the rod alone.
--
Tom Horne

[This message has been edited by tdhorne (edited 12-12-2006).]
_________________________
Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 02/23/13
Posts: 204
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 109 Guests and 8 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals