 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#174931 - 02/17/08 01:16 PM
Re: Clearance Issues
[Re: Alan Nadon]
|
leland
Member
Registered: 08/20/07
Posts: 396
Loc: Lowell area, Ma. USA
|
Offline
|
|
I imagine no permit on the addition.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174954 - 02/18/08 05:56 AM
Re: Clearance Issues
[Re: leland]
|
Texas_Ranger
Member
Registered: 12/17/01
Posts: 1855
Loc: Vienna, Austria
|
|
Offline
|
|
That's not a working space violation any more, that's plain old lack of any common sense!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174970 - 02/18/08 06:54 PM
Re: Clearance Issues
[Re: EV607797]
|
leland
Member
Registered: 08/20/07
Posts: 396
Loc: Lowell area, Ma. USA
|
|
Offline
|
|
Heres another one for you.
100A 3P emergency panel. 120/208
(Still working on my computer skills, ARRRGGG)
Edited by leland (02/18/08 06:55 PM)
Edit Reason: I'm a moron!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174971 - 02/18/08 07:22 PM
Re: Clearance Issues
[Re: leland]
|
leland
Member
Registered: 08/20/07
Posts: 396
Loc: Lowell area, Ma. USA
|
|
Offline
|
|
This is the outside look, from the stairwell landing.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174991 - 02/19/08 07:47 AM
Re: Clearance Issues
[Re: leland]
|
electure
Moderator
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 3619
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
|
|
Offline
|
|
Is the clearance issue really an issue? Some food for thought.
In the 1953 NEC the minimum horizontal working space clearance is given as 1-1/2 feet, measured from the live parts to a not grounded or live surface.
In the 1975 NEC, the same conditions under 600 volts was
2-1/2 feet.
It wasn't until the 1978 Edition of the NEC that it was increased to 3 feet.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174999 - 02/19/08 11:09 AM
Re: Clearance Issues
[Re: electure]
|
Texas_Ranger
Member
Registered: 12/17/01
Posts: 1855
Loc: Vienna, Austria
|
|
Offline
|
|
Don't know... to me it rather looks like 1 foot and not 1 1/2 but the picture might be deceiving.
As for the age of the addition... the 5 panel door on the addition looks older than the main house, so they might have used scrounged parts... no idea.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator: electure, Trumpy, Scott35, Ryan_J, Roger, resqcapt19, renosteinke, pauluk, LK, iwire, dougwells, C-H
|
|
