ECN Forum
Posted By: Admin What caused this situation? - 04/16/08 01:56 PM
What caused this situation?

submitted by Joe Tedesco:

[Linked Image from electrical-photos.com]
Posted By: Joe Tedesco Re: What caused this situation? - 04/16/08 02:42 PM
Here's another picture of a situation that is constantly questioned by many everywhere!

The termination's of the EGC and Grounded (Neutral) conductor.

[Linked Image from electricalphotos.com]
Posted By: gfretwell Re: What caused this situation? - 04/16/08 04:07 PM
(ref top pic)
A loose connection and an uncleared ground fault?
It looks like the bottom conductor wasn't inserted all the way through and missed being clamped by the screw
Posted By: SteveFehr Re: What caused this situation? - 04/16/08 04:27 PM
The panel EGC and neutral look awfully small... And the terminal bus is rusty.

Looks also like the insulation wasn't stripped properly on that burnt wire, either- not only was it offset and the screw not properly clamping it, but might have been insulated from the screw preventing proper contact, too. Poor contact = not enough fault current to trip the breaker + excessive heating = fire.

This isn't an FPE panel, is it?
Posted By: HotLine1 Re: What caused this situation? - 04/16/08 11:35 PM
Top pic...bad connections, two conductors under 1 screw. Result of low quality workmanship. This design of neutral/ground buss was in GE panels, and the installer had to get the conductor directly under the screw to get a decent termination. Two conductors result in deflection to the sides of the screw, resulting in a poor termination. the poor termination results in a high resistance connection, creating heat on the neutral conductor, and you have a pic of the ultimate end result. This is based on my opinion, and experience.

The second pic, IMHO is an OLD panel that has a corrosion situation. Also, it appears that the two conductors under 1 screw situation is here also.
Posted By: WESTUPLACE Re: What caused this situation? - 04/17/08 03:15 AM
Two wires of different gauge in 1 hole. Only one tight.
Posted By: rhagfo Re: What caused this situation? - 04/17/08 04:02 AM
Top Pic Why double lug??? Looks like there a plenty of avaiable unused terminals.
Posted By: HotLine1 Re: What caused this situation? - 04/17/08 10:11 PM
Rhagfo:
Terminating the neutral and ground conductors in one lug, or under 1 screw was a 'trade practice' in some areas. The reasoning was to keep the neutral & grd 'together' for tracing purposes. BTW, not a 'practice' that I have done, nor taught to anyone, but something the 'old-timers' passed on to the 'young guys'.

Posted By: Elviscat Re: What caused this situation? - 04/18/08 10:07 AM
I'd venture that a loose connection+neutral current on the EGC leads to a burnt/corroded connection. In times gone by it used to be common practice to put 2 neutrals under one screw, this created a definite hazard when one of the circuits is a multiwire, and the other circuit was being removed or serviced.
Posted By: mikesh Re: What caused this situation? - 04/18/08 04:55 PM
Current code would of course demand 1 neutral per terminal.
Manufacturers instruction state 1 conductor per terminal for Grounded circuit conductors. The bonding terminal however are allowed 2 #14 or 2 #12 copper or 2#12 or 2#10 aluminum under 1 screw. 1 wire per terminal for larger bonding conductors up to the largest wire permitted for the particular bonding terminal which is often #6. Larger bonding conductors can be accommodated by adding factory approved lugs to the bonding strips or to the enclosure.
I have always followed the 1 neutral 1 screw but until about 10 years ago it was as many bonding wires as would fit as long as we twisted them all together.
© ECN Electrical Forums