ECN Forum
Posted By: cougarweeds Is this a code violation - 12/07/02 04:02 PM
I am in North Carolina and just completed my 1 year walk through with my builder for items to repair. I have outside spot lights (plastic fixture that holds 2 flood lamps) on two corners of my house. I took one down to put up a motion sensor and discovered that there was no box behind the fixture. The electrical wire was pulled through the vinyl soffet and the light was held in place by a sheet metal screw in the metal edging that holds up the soffet. My builder has told me that this light fixture does not require a junction box because it is considered a "pancake box." My concern is that the wire connections are up against the vinyl soffet and metal edging and I thought that all connections were supposed to be contained. If this is a violation and my builder is lying, who do I contact to correct the problem. Thanks!
Posted By: spyder Re: Is this a code violation - 12/07/02 04:30 PM
Sounds like a violation to me the way you describe it.
Posted By: Bill Addiss Re: Is this a code violation - 12/07/02 04:50 PM
Cougar,

It should have a box behind it. Here is a "Pancake Box" it is usually 3-1/2 or 4 inches round and 1/2" deep. There may be other depths but you get the idea. It may also have built-in clamps for NM Cable.

[Linked Image from elec-cat.tnb.com]

Bill
Posted By: CTwireman Re: Is this a code violation - 12/07/02 05:52 PM
Sounds like you are being lied to. The builder's electrician would be responsible for correcting this problem.

I would also inform the local electrical inspector so they can be on the lookout for these shoddy practices in the future (if inspections actually exsist in your area.)
Posted By: Bjarney Re: Is this a code violation - 12/07/02 08:04 PM
Not too pick nits too much—but is Bill A's illustrated pancake box suitable for damp or wet locations? Should that be an issue here? Where do you draw the line?
Posted By: Bill Addiss Re: Is this a code violation - 12/07/02 08:18 PM
Bjarney,

Good question,
This is commonly used though (made of plastic too). If you think of it as being recessed into the building finish would that make a difference? Fixtures installed in wet locations must be "installed so that water cannot enter or accumulate in wiring compartments ..." (410.4(A)) This is usually done by caulking or ducseal. Doesn't this mean that the box itself effectively out of a wet location when used on a wall outside? And if the Fixture is sealed in this manner it should also cover requirements for Boxes installed in Damp or Wet locations as per 314.15(A)

In our specific case here I read it as being under a soffit and therefore not a wet location as per Article 100 Definition. " .. unprotected locations exposed to the weather" I don't see any requirement for Boxes to be listed for Damp locations.

Bill

[This message has been edited by Bill Addiss (edited 12-07-2002).]
Posted By: cougarweeds Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 12:19 AM
Thanks for your help. I will call the county inspector on Monday. The Pancake box pictured should be mounted on the structure of the house, correct? When I removed the middle screw of the light fixture and pulled it down there is just the the wires with nothing behind them but soffet.
Posted By: CTwireman Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 12:24 AM
The pancake box could be used to mount the light fixture, but it would be much easier to use a surface mount 4" round weatherproof box. They cost around $5.

Again, the electrician that did the original installation should pay to have this fixed, not you.
Posted By: sparky Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 12:37 AM
like these CT ?

[Linked Image from hubbell-raco.com]
Posted By: Bjarney Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 01:14 AM
Thanks for your research and reply, Bill. {I wasn’t trying to pick a fight or anything.} I assume that their acceptable ‘track record’ for an outdoors ungasketed fixture is generally good, but in many commercial or industrial premises it may be considered much differently.
Posted By: Wirenuttt Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 02:13 AM
Definately different as Bjarney points out in industrial. The specs, submitals, inspector,architech, clerk of works and the electrical engineer.
Posted By: harold endean Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 03:20 AM
Check section 300-15(a)1999 NEC where it says that "Where the wirinng method is...
nonmetallic sheathed cable, or other cables, a box or conduit body complying with article 370 shall be installed at each conductor splice point..."

Harold
Posted By: ElectricAL Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 04:57 AM
BJarney,

I'll grab at another nit to be picked.

Awhile back, the cubic inch space in the luminaire canopy was excluded, when doing wire count / box capacity checks. As a result, even the 4" pancake no longer has the volume needed to run a 14 NM into. Clamp + ground + hot + neutral = 8 cubes.

CT,

Your suggestion of box is an excellent solution.

Al

[This message has been edited by ElectricAL (edited 12-07-2002).]
Posted By: Bill Addiss Re: Is this a code violation - 12/08/02 06:31 AM
BJarney,

Sorry if I sounded argumentative. I didn't mean to. [Linked Image] I just wanted to be thorough and was musing whether a box recessed in the wall is actually outside the house.

Bill
Posted By: cougarweeds Re: Is this a code violation - 12/12/02 04:01 AM
Thanks Guys!!!!!!!!

I called the inspector's office at 8:15 am and by 9am he had been to my house and the builder had called me to admit they were wrong.

Have a Happy Holiday Season!!
© ECN Electrical Forums