ECN Forum
Posted By: gfretwell Romex before dry in - 12/27/13 05:11 AM
There was a question on the building code forum that got some conversation.
Can you pull in Romex before the building is completely dried in?
Contractors seemed to say maybe or it was OK, most of the inspectors just said no.

It sounds like a classic damp location to me. Maybe if they could find NM-c but that seems to be a ghost product. The manufacturer sites I looked at send you to UF when you search on NM-c
Posted By: renosteinke Re: Romex before dry in - 12/27/13 05:35 AM
I don't have much of a problem. Heck, nearly every job seems to have 'complete' delayed by a window here and a door there. A little rain won't bother the Romex. Period. Just think of all the other 'indoor' materials that are OK for temporary, in the weather, on-site exposure (OSB, etc).

More of a concern is theft and vandalism; that's the real reason most EC's wait until the site can be 'secured.'

Thermal insulation is another matter. I suspect that most places schedule the 'rough' wiring just before they complete the 'dry in;' they want the sparkies out of the insulator's way, and the sparkies prefer to not have to work around piles of drywall.
Posted By: shortcircuit Re: Romex before dry in - 12/27/13 09:41 PM
They don't make NMC anymore. With UF on the market, NMC went to the wayside.

We need to be weather tight round here to pull romex in...
Posted By: Tesla Re: Romex before dry in - 12/27/13 11:44 PM
With experience, electrical contractors have found that the framing is not really done until it's a dry box: house wrap going on even before the last nail goes in.

Not withstanding the contract or verbal assurances, it's discovered that GCs and owners feel free to re-frame right up until the last moment -- especially if the framing crew is still on site.

The extras imposed uppon the EC are not going to be accepted/ paid for as a consequence.

Further, the EC has all of the joy of working around another trade -- that's not used to working around others.

The correct sequence is:
Frame all the way to house wrap...
Plumbers...
Electricians...
Insulation...
Sheetrock...

For lowest cost: none of these trades expects to work around the others in residential spaces.

Everyone is bidding so tightly that they can't eat imposed mistakes, extras are not tolerated well.

Screwy, clever, ways of speeding up the process oft times result in bankruptcies of the GC.
Posted By: shortcircuit Re: Romex before dry in - 12/28/13 12:08 AM
Around here it goes...

Frame...
Roofing...
Windows...
Siding...
Plumbers...
HVAC...
Electricians...
Alarm...
ROUGH INSPECTIONS

The inspectors don't what any dry location material installed until the structure is weather tight...
Posted By: HotLine1 Re: Romex before dry in - 12/28/13 02:44 AM
Usual scenario is...
Frame
Roofing
Windows/Doors (temp)
HVAC
Plumbers
Electricians
ROUGH INSPECTIONS: Elec/Plumb/Fire
Framing inspection
Insulation
Insulation Inspection

Mix a few 'red tags' inbetween......

The alarm, A/V, Comm slip in accordingly.

No wiring is installed before the structure is weather tight. Very few have tried, none have been successful...
Posted By: gfretwell Re: Romex before dry in - 12/28/13 07:24 AM
This was posed as a multi story commercial building. The reference was because of the allowance of Romex above 3 floors. They were asking about starting the wiring on lower floors before the building was topped out and dried in.
Posted By: gfretwell Re: Romex before dry in - 12/28/13 07:28 AM
In SFR around here they usually get the Framing, electrical, plumbing and HVAC (pre drywall)) at the same time (called the FEPA/C) and these days it might be the same inspector doing it all.

In the tough times the more licenses you had, the better chance you were not laid off.
Posted By: Tesla Re: Romex before dry in - 12/28/13 11:27 AM
Greg...

I didn't comprehend that the job was that large.

///

Out my way, the AHJ still won't permit Romex beyond 3 floors.

Chicago is paranoid about fires -- hence EMT forever...

California is paranoid about earthquakes -- hence MC is pushed where the NEC would settle for Romex.

MC does have one overriding advantage in commercial construction: it can tolerate structures still open to the elements. That can make it, ultimately, the cheapest way to go: the time to completion can be drastically shortened.

====

In my entire career, I only had one job where the boss wanted to transition from MC to Romex. It was a horrific mistake on his part: the Romex space was too small. Just transitioning wasted whatever materials savings he thought might be had.

Ultimately, he made enough mistakes -- on enough jobs -- to take himself out of the game. His biggest mistake was alienating his foremen while sucking up to his apprentices.

This is a tick seen all too often in the trades: the boss can't leave his own foreman's cap behind -- and treats his (foreman) subordinates like they're still his rivals for promotion -- even though he owns the whole firm!

(Mentally, he was trapped: 'competing' with the design solutions and management grace of his own top men. Doing so, he failed to function as the top manager, top salesman.)



Posted By: ghost307 Re: Romex before dry in - 12/29/13 03:28 PM
Fire is only the 'official' reason for Chicago requiring that everything be in conduit.
Posted By: harold endean Re: Romex before dry in - 12/31/13 06:30 PM
If I got to a job site and they were missing windows and the job was already rough wired, I would look at the wire, if it was far enough away from the window and it was dry, I wouldn't have a problem, but if the new box was right below the window, or if the RX was wet, I would red tag the job. I seen pre-fab sun rooms like that where the whole bottom of the room was roughed in and waiting for the windows above it. That would only pass if the job was roughed on 1 day and made weather tight on the next day without rain.
© ECN Electrical Forums