ECN Forum
Posted By: Niko Ch9 table 1 - 03/17/10 06:24 AM
Table one of Ch 9 says if we have one conductor we can fill the conduit to 53%, 2 conductor to 31% and more than 2 conductors the conduit can be filled to 40%.
My question is why 31% for 2 conductors and 40% for more than 2 conductors? what is rational behind it.

An IAEI instructor once told me it is because of the heat dissipation. But he did not explain in details why?

Thanks.
Posted By: gfretwell Re: Ch9 table 1 - 03/17/10 06:41 AM
It just has to do with how they pack into the pipe. Three takes up less room than 150% of 2 and it is volume we are speaking of.
Heat really doesn't enter into it. You derate "x" number of conductors the same no matter what size pipe it is in.
Posted By: Rewire Re: Ch9 table 1 - 03/17/10 02:14 PM
ask your instructor to elabroate.Then come tell us.
Posted By: Niko Re: Ch9 table 1 - 03/17/10 08:44 PM
Rewire,
the instructor was at a seminar. so i don't have access to him anymore.

I have posted the same question at Mike's site http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=123904
but i am still not 100% confident on my understanding.
Posted By: Tesla Re: Ch9 table 1 - 03/18/10 12:23 AM
It's the radius of the conductors...

Do the math.

It boils down to the straight geometry of circles.

The conduit/EMT is the big circle...

Now how many circles can you fit inside leaving enough room to pull in without excessive force/ruining the insulation.

That's all that's involved.
Posted By: Rewire Re: Ch9 table 1 - 03/18/10 01:26 AM
http://www.pdhcenter.com/courses/e122/e122content.pdf for a more in depth explanation
Posted By: sabrown Re: Ch9 table 1 - 03/18/10 05:44 PM
Expounding on Tesla, 3 conductors can line up in a straight line so all the diameters add up. 4 or more and bundle collapses (the conductors don't ever twist up to line out in a row. Thus the binding issue for 3 conductors.
Posted By: Rewire Re: Ch9 table 1 - 03/19/10 01:32 PM
just when it all makes sense they bring in nipples
© ECN Electrical Forums