ECN Forum
Posted By: FWW56 Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 01:35 PM
A residential roofer was killed Fri. Story here

First and foremost, my sympathies go out to the mans family.

Although I do not know the details, I would not be surprised to find out that the young man was working as a "sub-contractor" and not covered by any workers comp. If this is the case it brings to light a problem that the legitimate contractors have been battling for years. Many small general contractors will sell these types of jobs and hire crews as sub contractors. These sub-contractors are then enticed by the appearance of "big money" and will then hire buddies under the table.

Although this particular instance involves a residentual roofing / remodeling contractor, it is something that all aspects of contracting have to deal with, from landscaping on up through all of the trades.

This has been a sore spot with me for many years, although there are laws in place that are supposed th police this sort of thing they are rarely enmforced letting the cycle continue, leaving the legitimate contractors to fight an uphill struggle against others that do not have anywhere near the overhead that is supposedly required.

FRANK
Posted By: Tiger Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 02:02 PM
Many contractors operate "owner-exempt" in regards to Workman's Comp. It's a legal option.

Dave
Posted By: renosteinke Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 03:41 PM
I note mention in the article of both a company and a crew; I expect he was an employee.
I also note the scaffolding was put back up as soon as everyone left.

In fairness to the contractor, I can't imagine ANY roofs getting fixed without violating that "10 ft" rule at some point. Scaffolding is also a lot safer than ladders.

While there are requirements for fall restraint equipment- I expect they are honored more in the breach.

High winds? Peeling siding? Looks like there were more than a few reasons to skip work that day.
Posted By: ShockMe77 Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 03:51 PM
That 10' rule is ridiculous. I understand why it's there, but c'mon. I can't even begin to tell you how many times I have personally violated that rule myself. Not deliberately, but because I had a job that needed to get done. This is common place in a city like Newark, NJ, for instance.
Posted By: LK Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 08:48 PM
"Many contractors operate "owner-exempt" in regards to Workman's Comp. It's a legal option."
_____________________________________________

Yes it is an option, not a good option , when i started out, i was owner exempt, not a corporation, what made me re think it, was every good paying residential job, the owner wanted proof of insurance, and i was unable to contract, with commercial, and industrial jobs without it.

"That 10' rule"
____________________________________________

The utility will disconnect the drop, the only reason for not following safety rules, is they don't want to schedule, or pay for the disconnect reconnect, it is sad, how the industry, has worked itself, to such low standards.
Posted By: renosteinke Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 09:16 PM
BTW....does anyone have the EXACT text, or can they cite, the "10 ft rule" rfered to in the article?
Posted By: LK Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 10:35 PM
John,

Don't forget there are Qualified, and Non Qualified distances, and different voltage limits. http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9910
_____________________________________________
"1910.333(c)(3)

"Overhead lines." if work is to be performed near overhead lines, the lines shall be deenergized and grounded, or other protective measures shall be provided before work is started. If the lines are to be deenergized, arrangements shall be made with the person or organization that operates or controls the electric circuits involved to deenergize and ground them. If protective measures, such as guarding, isolating, or insulating, are provided, these precautions shall prevent employees from contacting such lines directly with any part of their body or indirectly through conductive materials, tools, or equipment."

From OSHA Regulations (Standards - 29 CFR)
_____________________________________________




[This message has been edited by LK (edited 03-11-2006).]
Posted By: ShockMe77 Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/11/06 11:57 PM
Lk, this will be my 16th year in the industry and never once have I ever had the POCO out to disconnect a drop before bugging-in. Did the POCO used to come out and disconnect before 1990?
Posted By: renosteinke Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/12/06 02:18 AM
Hey- Don't shoot the messenger! I asked for a direct cite...and Les was kind enough to provide it!

As Les' opening comment suggests, perhaps there are different rules for those who know electric work, and are equipped to deal with it (like electricians)....and different rules for those who have other things on their minds (like roofers).

I like to know the actual rule being referred to, for two reasons:
- First, the press, and others, are notorious at mis-stating things. I like to know the facts; and,
- Often the exact wording of a rule and some very important "details," necessary to apply it properly!
Posted By: LK Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/12/06 03:08 AM
"Lk, this will be my 16th year in the industry and never once have I ever had the POCO out to disconnect a drop before bugging-in. Did the POCO used to come out and disconnect before 1990?"

We are talking about non qualified workers here, they are the ones not following the rules.
As for electricians, working on service drops and UG services, there are cases where you may need the utility to disconnect before working, I have seen guys try to replace meter pans hot on UG services, they tape it up, and remove the pan, I would never think of doing this, nor would i expect any of my workers do it, under any conditions, Back in the 70's our utility ran a demo, where they faulted the drop, once you see the result of this demo, i can assure you, a true respect will set in.
Posted By: Celtic Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/12/06 04:00 AM
renosteinke
Quote
BTW....does anyone have the EXACT text, or can they cite, the "10 ft rule" rfered to in the article?

try this on:
Quote

1910.333(c)(3)(i)(A)

When an unqualified person is working in an elevated position near overhead lines, the location shall be such that the person and the longest conductive object he or she may contact cannot come closer to any unguarded, energized overhead line than the following distances:

1910.333(c)(3)(i)(A)(1)

For voltages to ground 50kV or below - 10 feet (305 cm);

1910.333(c)(3)(i)(A)(2)

For voltages to ground over 50kV - 10 feet (305 cm) plus 4 inches (10 cm) for every 10kV over 50kV.
Above from:
Selection and use of work practices - 1910.333 http://tinyurl.com/pla2e (Had to reduce OSHA's link)


Here are a few more links:
A Guide to Scaffold Use in the Construction Industry Small Business Safety Management Series

OSHA 3150
2002 (Revised) http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3150/osha3150.html

Frequently Violated OSHA Standards Related to Overhead Power Lines in the Construction Industry
January 1, 1995 - February 8, 2000 (Sequential Order by Standard) http://www.osha.gov/Region7/overheadpowerlines/elecstds.html

OVERHEAD POWER LINES - DON'T GET ZAPPED!
EMPLOYER KIT
February 3, 2003 http://www.osha.gov/Region7/overheadpowerlines/index.html
Posted By: Trumpy Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/12/06 04:20 AM
Our Power Companies here have a system where if we are notified of impending work near our lines, we will sleeve them for free
Here's one of our guys doing just that:

[Linked Image]

Anything less is a bad excuse for safety practice. [Linked Image]
Posted By: pauluk Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/12/06 03:06 PM
That's quite common here as well. When scaffolding is up for work on a building, you'll often see bright yellow sleeving over the lines which has been fitted temporarily by the PoCo.
Posted By: sandro2 Re: Roofer electricuted - 03/19/06 03:00 AM
Most poco's come out witin a day or so in my area. I got a call from a roofer who said they hit the service cable lifting a material pulley to the roof. When I got there I saw they actually hit a hi tension wire and it blew the capping off the roof started a fire and blew a hole thru the side of the pulley. That is the problem some contr. never put safety first it would have been a simple call to have the wires protected.
© ECN Electrical Forums