ECN Forum
Posted By: Texas_Ranger Any violations in this panel? - 12/14/09 12:22 AM
Tonight I googled to find a picture of a US panel in order to explain some things over at some German dicussion board. I stumbled across this pictures, and before I make any statements on it, I wanted to ask you guys if you see any obvious violations.
Panel picture
According to the web site this is a new panel (site is dated 2008) installed in Taunton MA. A few things struck me odd, such as the apparent lack of a GEC and the white wires on those DP breakers top right.
Posted By: renosteinke Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/14/09 02:50 AM
Good eye, TR. Let me explain what I see:

First, I believe this is a 'main' panel, being fed from underground. This is suggested by the type of cable used, the lack of a separate ground buss, and the use of a green bonding screw to bond the case to the neutral buss (visible in lower left).

(Edited to remove a sentence with a big goof! Oops! )

As such, there ought to be a nice, big, fat bare copper wire in there that would connect to a grounding electrode. I see no such wire, though the lug for it is laying in the bottom left of the panel. (That type of lug is designed to attach to the neutral busa).

Generally, the clamps where the cables enter the panel are approved for use with two cables. It appears that this was done.

Looking at the combined neutral/ ground busses, I see several places where more than one wire is landed under a screw. While you are generally allowed as many as three ground wires under one screw, each neutral wire must be mounted separately. In at least on place, there are two white wires under the same screw- an error.

In the far bottom left of the panel is a breaker with some white wires attached to it. This is an AFCI breaker, and the connections are correct.

In the upper right of the panel are several 2-pole breakers with white wires attached. This is wrong; the wires need to be clearly identified as 'hot' wires. This is usually done by marking a significant part of the white wire with colored tape, heat shrink tubing, or colored ink/paint.

The white wires can always be properly marked. How the guy plans to connect to the ground electrode has me puzzled; with the wall closed up, it won't be easy.

============================================
There's another way to look at this panel.

Perhaps there is another another disconnect before this panel. This is very possible, almost certain - as I don't see a meter present either. The grounding electrod conductor might very well be connected at that point.

IF that is the case, there should be FOUR wires entering the bottom of the panel - 2 hots, a neutral, and a ground - and a separate ground buss for the ground wires. The green screw should NOT be used in this arrangement.

Until fairly recently, the part of our code that addresses this situation was a lot more confusine than it is today. With no metal path between the disconnect and the panel - note that the wiring method is a cable, rather than conduit - this is more of a 'technical' violation than a real safety risk.

==========================================

In summary, the guy mixed two different methods in this installation, resulting in something that complies with neither.
Posted By: NORCAL Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/14/09 03:00 AM
I see a main breaker in that HOMEline panel, but do not see a GEC in there & would hope that is not a SE UG feed, I am glad that SE cable is not used here as not a method allowed in the PG&E Greenbook.
Posted By: renosteinke Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/14/09 03:03 AM
You're right ... there is a main breaker ... I was so busy looking at trees I missed the forest! Oops.
Posted By: frenchelectrican Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/14/09 03:09 AM
There are couple quirks I will say in here the netural conductors that bundled in each hole that is a no-no but for EGC c'est ok IMO it will be alot nicer if it have own grounding bussbar for this useage which I done all the time it cost little more upfront but in long run it look much neater plus what more .,,

If that area requied a extreal disconnection source it is very easy to swap over to 4 conductor set up.

Merci.
Marc
Posted By: leland Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/14/09 04:11 AM
As A Massachusetts guy-

Doubled up neutrals- very wrong.
As far as GEC- Based on bonding screw- lower left corner.
(1) Perhaps it is plastic water pipe (main)= no connection.There fore no visible GEC in panel.
-Unless done all in 'PEX' I'm concerned about no bonding conductor to what little copper pipe there may be.-
(2) 2 ground rods- connected at the meter socket (not uncommon here).
(3) Uffer extended outside,same as above.

As far as the SE cable, very common here as well.
I can't see enough below the panel to comment on UG or not.

Basically,looks OK.
Posted By: Texas_Ranger Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/14/09 04:52 PM
I already thought the bottom left ought to be a GFCI/AFCI breaker based on the curled white wire. However, the top right ones are (even to my outside view) clearly double poles, so I expected re-identified whites as Reno pointed out.

@leland: so you don't run a ground between meter and main panel then, only the neutral which is bonded to the enclosure at the main panel?
Posted By: leland Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/15/09 02:21 AM
Originally Posted by Texas_Ranger
I already thought the bottom left ought to be a GFCI/AFCI breaker based on the curled white wire. However, the top right ones are (even to my outside view) clearly double poles, so I expected re-identified whites as Reno pointed out.

@leland: so you don't run a ground between meter and main panel then, only the neutral which is bonded [color:#CC33CC]to the enclosure at the main panel?
[/color][/color]

That is correct,here. Bond at the meter OR the panel,Again,Concern about no visual bond to water Piping.
As far as 're-Identification', on the residential end,Very rarely to never.

This panel may just be a "change out",Therefore not requiring the AFCI,(it does look like 'very'new wires though) Bottom left is most likely the GFCI feeding the bathrooms,garage and outside receps.
Posted By: leland Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/15/09 02:38 AM
Above comments based on 'assumption',That this is the MAIN panel.
Drop to meter,then to main breaker.
Posted By: JoeKP Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/15/09 05:43 AM
in Taunton Ma eh? i may have to go hunt this one down, its in the town just next to me. ill remember to take pics if i can find it wink
Posted By: Niko Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/15/09 06:24 AM
If this based on 2008 then all multiwire branch circuits shall be provided with a means to disconnect all ungrounded conductors at the same time.
210.4(b)
Circuit # 11&13

This could also be a main disconnect that is located inside nearest point of entrance 230.70(A)(1)
Posted By: WireNuts29 Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/18/09 12:14 AM
i was just looking at that business page. Acording to the about us section the owner is operating with 2 jopurneyman class "b" licenses. I'm about 99% sure here in ma he cannot operate under any business name other than his own name, which apears on his license. not to be a stickler..
Posted By: leland Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/18/09 04:46 AM
Class 'A'- master Electrician- Hire as many J-men as you want, Par take in any end of the business you want.

Since this State went with the A-B-C lick my ...... 'Your mother has red hair' licenses.....
BULL CRAP! I don't even know where I stand!!!!!!
What I'm licensed for ETC.

Now they are trying to 'redistribute the wealth'.
A Master Electrician USED to mean something!!!!!!
Now, A low..... Never mind.... I'll B(8&H To others.

It is all about the money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oops, did I express my disgust for the Government?

Not sure where I am going with this ,sorry.

But Massachusetts is getting crazy with their licensing rules. Time to take it back.
Posted By: leland Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/18/09 04:52 AM
Originally Posted by Texas_Ranger
Tonight I googled to find a picture of a US panel in order to explain some things over at some German dicussion board. I stumbled across this pictures, and before I make any statements on it, I wanted to ask you guys if you see any obvious violations.
Panel picture
According to the web site this is a new panel (site is dated 2008) installed in Taunton MA. A few things struck me odd, such as the apparent lack of a GEC and the white wires on those DP breakers top right.



Have we determined yet, Is this a NEW install,or a change out?
That can and does mean a world of difference.

Before we get too far off track. (as I think I have,above)
Sorry.
Posted By: leland Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/18/09 04:57 AM
Originally Posted by WireNuts29
i was just looking at that business page. Acording to the about us section the owner is operating with 2 jopurneyman class "b" licenses. I'm about 99% sure here in ma he cannot operate under any business name other than his own name, which apears on his license. not to be a stickler..


In Massachusetts:
B lic = journey man.
The company name MUST be- "Ralph J. Cramden. Electrician". Can not be "RJC Electric"- That is a violation- punishable by license revocation.
This J-man is limited to 1 helper- does not need to be an apprentice (registered).
Posted By: Texas_Ranger Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/18/09 01:32 PM
Originally Posted by leland
Originally Posted by Texas_Ranger
Tonight I googled to find a picture of a US panel in order to explain some things over at some German dicussion board. I stumbled across this pictures, and before I make any statements on it, I wanted to ask you guys if you see any obvious violations.
Panel picture
According to the web site this is a new panel (site is dated 2008) installed in Taunton MA. A few things struck me odd, such as the apparent lack of a GEC and the white wires on those DP breakers top right.



Have we determined yet, Is this a NEW install,or a change out?
That can and does mean a world of difference.


I guess there is no way to tell, based on the information given on the web site.
This ias all they say:
Quote
New Panel Install

New electrical panel installed in a Taunton home, part of a two family service installation.

So, at least new service, but lord knows what else.
Posted By: Scott35 Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/18/09 03:53 PM
As to the lack of Grounding Electrode Conductor bonding at this Panel:

The Grounded Conductor may be bonded to the Grounding Electrode System at the Meter Section.

Scott
Posted By: leland Re: Any violations in this panel? - 12/18/09 11:26 PM
--Quote:
New Panel Install

New electrical panel installed in a Taunton home, part of a two family service installation.---

Given that info. the bond should be in the panel.
Simple reason is the POCO no longer wants the bond in their equipment and It must be visible.

Code Art. not handy right now.
© ECN Electrical Forums