|
1 members (Scott35),
235
guests, and
27
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,682 Likes: 3
OP
Administrator Member
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
Member
|
never seen a teardrop as a grounding bus before. would like to see some protection on the ground up to the meter socket.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 697
Member
|
These are pictures of a service upgrade done a few years ago. I was doing a slow burn because the owner (the mother of friends who helped raise my children) said that she was charged $2000 for the job. She looked for the invoice and couldn't find it, but I saw a permit for $1000.
If it was a proper job $1000 would be in the ballpark (there were some extras), but $2000 would be gouging, & who needs to gouge a nice old lady?
Dave
edited completely for a change of tact
[This message has been edited by Dave55 (edited 11-03-2004).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 697
Member
|
Has anyone seen the service riser bent around a gutter like this? It was a first for me.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 193
Member
|
Has anyone seen the service riser bent around a gutter like this? It was a first for me. It looks a little better than going straight thru it. Just MHO. But this is a first for me also.
"If common sense was common, everyone would have it"-not sure, someone here
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 697
Member
|
The panel pictures and meter pictures are showing a violation of Article 250.64(B) and (C) (Securing and Continuous). I thought the mast might be a violation of 344.30(A)...Securing and Supporting, but "with approval", it's allowed over 3' on a mast. It's certainly a violation of 230.24 Clearances (less than 18"). These are the same project as "This Old House".
Dave
|
|
|
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
|
|
|
|
|