ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 260 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#113664 09/14/02 01:01 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 3
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
2 Photos are Courtesy of ThinkGood:

What can be said about these Splices? What is wrong with them, what are the concerns here? What code section(s) do they violate? (more pictures are welcome)

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

#113665 09/14/02 07:23 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
in a nutshell this is vunderable, the proverbial 'flying splice' as is said.

it is exposed to movement, enviroment, and personal contact and is considered a cut and dry no-no in the trade save for those instances ( as in service entrance) where the NEC defines the exact parameters permitting it.

from the NEC...

Quote
300.15 Boxes, Conduit Bodies, or Fittings — Where Required.
A box shall be installed at each outlet and switch point for concealed knob-and-tube wiring.
Fittings and connectors shall be used only with the specific wiring methods for which they are designed and listed.
Where the wiring method is conduit, tubing, Type AC cable, Type MC cable, Type MI cable, nonmetallic-sheathed cable, or other cables, a box or conduit body complying with Article 314 shall be installed at each conductor splice point, outlet point, switch point, junction point, termination point, or pull point, unless otherwise permitted in 300.15(A) through (M).

art 314 goes into specific detail....


pix #2 has an addition dilema in that the outer jacket is not 'continous' .

this meaning that the load side could be energized and not make to ground and fault out a breaker/fuse as it should...


NEC again...
Quote
300.12 Mechanical Continuity — Raceways and Cables.
Metal or nonmetallic raceways, cable armors, and cable sheaths shall be continuous between cabinets, boxes, fittings, or other enclosures or outlets.
Exception: Short sections of raceways used to provide support or protection of cable assemblies from physical damage shall not be required to be mechanically continuous.

#113666 09/14/02 09:07 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,498
T
Member
Also splice #1 doesn't seem to use wirenuts and the stuff it's covered with looks like ordinary scotch tape to me, not proper electric tape.

#113667 09/14/02 04:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
Er, uhh, exquisite ground continuity.

#113668 09/17/02 08:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 518
J
Member
Just today, I found a box where plastic, conical masonry wall anchors were used in place of wire nuts; and no, the wires were not twisted together first!


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5