1 members (Scott35),
235
guests, and
27
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445 Likes: 3
OP
Cat Servant Member
|
Chad Fabry, a home inspector, came across this darling: Now, I wonder ... with electricity flowing "out" one half of the breaker, and "in" the other, is the electromagnetic part of the breaker made inoperable?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 152
Member
|
What a gem! Depending on the slot you used for each SP breaker you could get 0 or 120V and for each DP breaker you could get 120 or 240V (to neutral), really great piece of work - love how the L1 and L2 lines are beautifully numbered, then hacked into a 3-ph panel.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 272
Member
|
So this wasn't existing was it? Seems that there would be a definite balancing issue for the neutral conductors on most, if not all mwbc's. Another good example of someone knowing just enough to be dangerous.
Luke
Luke Clarke Electrical Planner for TVA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
Member
|
Is that rust on the neutral lug? (top right corner)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794 Likes: 3
Member
|
Seems that if someone was to backfeed the 100 amp breakers as a main, they could have just tied the 3rd bus lug to 2nd bus lug. (Far as I can see, there's nothing on the bus lugs). Or just take the sltrsfy live output of the 70 amp breaker and loop that up to the 3rd bus lug. Would that make it a sub-panel imbedded in the main panel? Not that that matters, this all violates code....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 943 Likes: 2
Member
|
Only one close to that is one I worked on where they had fed a 3 phase panel from a single phase tranformer and jumpering from center lug to right hand lug whole thing was a blooming mess.Another comment, seeing that is a I-T-E panel was jumper still in place on the split neutral? I am assuming its a sub not a main panel, otherwise grounding and grounded are bonded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
Member
|
The installer missed the obvious jumper location: at the bus lugs at the top, still unused.
Our man has jumpered A and C phases ( Black and Blue )
Putting '#2' at position #3 is too cute.
Said jumpering will not produce any single pole breaker with a voltage of 0. All will show full voltage.
Double pole breakers will only show 0 volts when tapping Black and Blue. Red/Blue and Black/Red combinations will deliver full voltage.
Such a set-up makes one think that the panel was boosted from a commercial job way back when. The price difference would always stop a legitimate player from wasting a three phase panel so.
Alternately, it's a second hand panel rigged up by a tradesman. Still, a waste of value.
Tesla
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 745
Member
|
Though this is certainly among the least of the problems here, isn't that 100a "main" breaker supposed to be fitted with some type of retaining screw if it is to be backfed like that (in any kind of panel)? In one case, I saw a three phase panel being fed by a single phase service. The "C" buss was not being used at all - the breakers were located only on "A" and "B". Still not right, but at least someone was thinking about the neutral balancing issue. regrettably, the cover had long since disappeared, so it was all too easy to view the interior . Mike (mamills) [This message has been edited by mamills (edited 01-05-2007).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 54
Member
|
A couple of years ago I was house hunting and saw one just like this, 3ph panel on a single phase service. They just didn't have any breakers in place on C phase....... If one panel wasn't bad enough, there was a 3ph subpanel in the utility room........
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 288
Member
|
I found (and corrected) one of these in an old warehouse, where an existing 240V delta had been rewired for 120/240.
|
|
|
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
|
|
|
|