ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 266 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#95483 09/16/05 12:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
Starting in October, CO detectors will be required in Connecticut, installed outside the bedroom area. I thought CO was heavier than air, and the detectors should maybe be installed in the basements. Comments??


Earl
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#95484 09/16/05 01:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 106
J
Member
I have installed CO detectors in a couple of homes that had fireplaces. The instructions that came with the ones I installed said to mount no higher than 48 inches above the floor.
[Linked Image]


Mike
#95485 09/16/05 03:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
Earl, Carbon Monoxide has a vapor density of between 0.97 and 1.0, meaning that it is slighter lighter or perhaps the same as air, which is 1.0. I have seen different references on it, but they all put it in that area.

You can look in the NEC handbook in Article 500 and find this info in the huge table they have, you can also find it in the Crouse-Hinds Digest, or you can look it up on the Internet.

I would personally install the combination CO/Smoke alarm and put it on the ceiling. That is what I see here in Utah, where they have been required for some time now.
Ryan


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#95486 09/16/05 03:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 106
J
Member
Thank you Ryan I should have pointed out that the detectors that I installed were retro and not in a new home. These were mounted beside of the beds in the bedroom and were for people that were using oxygen. Two of these detectors activated both audio and a strobe light which came with them.

My brain shorted and the thought of the combo type didn’t enter my mind. The only ones that I though of was those that I had installed last fall. [Linked Image]
Trumpy has me holding my horse over in the General Discussion Area and I am wore out from holding on to his tail so I will blame it on him. [Linked Image]


Mike
#95487 09/16/05 06:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
CO detectors are not, in my opinion, something that should be mandated.

I dislike combination CO/smoke detectors, as they address different problems. In my opinion, this means they should be used differently.

Smoke detectors have nearly 30 years of employment, and their use is widely understood. There is, in the case of smoke detectors, something to be said for locating them where they are likely to be near a source of fire. (We place them atop staircases because smoke will be "drawn" there.)

CO detectors have a different use all together.
First of all, CO has a cumulative effect. It also, as Ryan pointed out, is essentially the same density as normal air.
Unlike smoke, CO is normally produced, and diluted to safe levels by the room air, or vented.

A major principle in alarm installation is to prevent false alarms. Placing a CO detector in a furnace room might seem like a good idea- but is sure to false alarm every time the main burner ignites (the large flame bloom produces a momentary 'bubble of CO, thet is quickly diluted or vented).

In my home, the smoke detector is just outside the bedroom; the CO detector sits on the night table, next to the bed.
I am primarily worried about CO that I might breath, while I am asleep and unaware. A review of the literature can endorse this location; while such a location would be completely wrong for a smoke detector.

There is also the matter of different alarm life-spans.
A photoelectric smoke alarm can last forever.
An ionisation type smoke detector has lost most of its' sensitivity after ten years.
A CO detector has a definite lifespan, and will not operate after five years.

CO detectors will also alarm if:
-exposed to natural gas; or,
-exposed to freezing temps.


The NFPA has a "standard" for CO detectors, which is essentially useless. The standard says "follow manufacturers' instructions.' Keep your $25.

#95488 09/16/05 07:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 259
J
Member
In MA we are required to install one on any direct vent furnace, boiler, or water heater. It needs to be on the same breaker as well. I do a lot of furnaces for Keyspan and boilers for contractors and it just adds to the bill.

#95489 09/16/05 07:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
Quote
The NFPA has a "standard" for CO detectors, which is essentially useless. The standard says "follow manufacturers' instructions.' Keep your $25.
Thats exactly right. Its the NFPA 720, and it doesn't say much. There were proposals made to get tehse into the IRC for 2003, but such were shot sown due to having no good standard to reference (720). I agree with John, these should not be required.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#95490 09/16/05 08:10 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 706
T
Member
My understanding follows some of the other posts. CO neither rises nor sinks, and is most dangerous while you're sleeping. Therefore, pillow-high near the bed (or other sleeping areas) seems like the best place to me.

Dave

#95491 09/16/05 08:28 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Here in NJ CO detectors are required, and have been for a few years. Policy that I know of is to 'follow mfg instructions'.

We have a two page 'official' paper, but...it's not written well.

Basically, IF there is a fuel burning appliance, a CO detector is required. One on each level (floor) where there are sleeping rooms. Battery and 'plug-in' types are allowed, as are combo units.

I'll get a copy of the official paper Monday, and if I have time, transcribe it here.

John


John
#95492 09/18/05 06:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
Thanks guys, you have cleared it up for me. I checked the internet, and found a webpage that suggests the CO detectors be installed outside the sleeping areas, on the ceilings. Right where the CT public act requires it.


Earl
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5