ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 235 guests, and 27 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#99440 11/07/05 11:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 209
H
Member
Paulp,

This is only one of many areas that are as clear as mud in the code book. That is why this forem is so great. You get a lot of great minds looking at the code from a lot of views with many years of experience. Stick around. It is pretty fascinating!

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#99441 11/09/05 07:39 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 335
S
Member
Paulp
Just to add my 2 cents worth. It's 24" to protect it from (amongst other things) the gardeners. Ref to "I saw all of that but my point is, is that this is a residence"... there is also some liability involved. What if you hire someone to work on the property, doesn't he have the right to assume there are no hazards (beyond the normal)?. If a worker cuts it and gets hurt there's a problem.
A short, true story. About 15 years back in the Northern VA area there wwas a 2 yr old who grabbed a hot wire in an apt closet. The last resident had bootlegged an outlet there and removed the outlet but not the wire. A painter painted the closet when the residents changed but told no one that he painted over an exposed wire. When all was said and done the court held the painter equally responsible (along with the past owner and the mgmnt) citing that a "reasonable man" would have reported the wire, even if he knew nothing about electricity. Seems to me that the same goes for knowingly placing a violation/hazard beneath the ground.
Just my 2 cents.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5