ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 184 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 830
S
Member
Tom, I was talking USE cable. It would not extend over 6 ft. inside the dwelling, as I was going to convert over in a junction box just inside the penetration of the outside wall. As of now I have decided just to go with copper conductors # 8 thhn, just to cover the load of the motors and pool light, and general use receptacle. Homeowner does not forsee a "swimming pool heat pumpt" to be installed. Thanks for the information and input.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 345
T
Member
gfretwell Member posted 08-04-2006 11:04 AM
Quote
Tom, He is talking about the feeder to a sub panel. I am not sure 680.21(A)(1) applies since it says "branch circuit". I agree it may be a distinction without a difference but that is the language we have.
gfretwell
I buy that. I guess I wasn't reading carefully enough. That raises another question. Could I supply a panel in an out building with three wire cable under the alternate feeder to out buildings rule and then supply pool equipment from that panel? That would seem an invitation to stray neutral current problems. The grounding electrode provided by an in ground pool would likely be a lower resistance electrode than the two driven rods the code would permit for that feeder configuration.
--
Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use." Thomas Alva Edison


Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Tom- 680.25 covers this. Looks like we need to have an equipment grounding conductor but in some cases it can be uninsulated.


George Little
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
I think Ryan drove a solid copper stake through the heart of 250.32(B)(2) for 2008


Greg Fretwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5