gfretwell Member posted 08-04-2006 11:04 AM
Tom, He is talking about the feeder to a sub panel. I am not sure 680.21(A)(1) applies since it says "branch circuit". I agree it may be a distinction without a difference but that is the language we have.
gfretwell
I buy that. I guess I wasn't reading carefully enough. That raises another question. Could I supply a panel in an out building with three wire cable under the alternate feeder to out buildings rule and then supply pool equipment from that panel? That would seem an invitation to stray neutral current problems. The grounding electrode provided by an in ground pool would likely be a lower resistance electrode than the two driven rods the code would permit for that feeder configuration.
--
Tom Horne
"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use." Thomas Alva Edison