ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (CoolWill), 250 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#97621 03/08/06 09:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
S
Member
We had a brief discussion in my alternating current principles class last night. The instructor was convinced that all grounded conductors at a receptacle location had to be pigtailed in order to not break the grounded path. Obviously, that's the best way to do the wiring at the receptacles, but is it necessary by the NEC? I only see this rule applying to multiwire installations where breaking the neutral could do serious damage to an appliance (like a PLASMA TELEVISION) if ever broken.

Comments?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#97622 03/08/06 10:15 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
You are correct. The rule in 300.13(B) only applies to the grounded conductor of a multiwire branch circuit.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
#97623 03/08/06 11:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
Member
hey shock,
how would you do it without a pigtail?
put "two" wires under one recepticle ground screw?
if so; where is the ul listing for this type of device?
we all agree that the ground is the most important conductor and a pig tail would be the only way.

h20

#97624 03/08/06 11:43 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 706
T
Member
The grounded conductor is the white/neutral

Dave

#97625 03/09/06 04:53 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
Member
opps "ed" not "ing"
my mistake....
then i agree, no pigtail required by nec.
not sure about damage to equipment since the "grounding" would still be there.
on a multiwire you open neut at homerun and you put 240 across the circuits and this is never good. although power tools run really fast for a little while yuk yuk.

h20

#97626 03/13/06 05:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7
T
Junior Member
Good Morning

What about 250.148(B)?

Tom

#97627 03/13/06 05:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7
T
Junior Member
opps same thing with grounded and grounding, got to wake up this am sorry

Tom

#97628 03/13/06 10:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
L
Member
The reason a device-dependent neutral path matters on multi-wire circuits is that, when handle-tied breakers are not used, one circuit can be deenergized to be worked on, but another sharing the same neutral can still be hot, making the load side of an opened neutral connection hot.


Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com
#97629 03/14/06 09:42 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
S
Member
Larry, and isn't it true that if the grounded splice comes apart, one leg of the multiwire branch circuit will carry a higher voltage than the other ungrounded conductor? I seem to recall seeing/ reading this in one of my trade books somewhere. Could you explain why this happens?

#97630 03/14/06 10:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
At the risk of insulting everyone's intelligence on this forum I explain it this way- If you have a multi-wire branch circuit consisting of two ungrounded conductors and one grounded conductor, the loads of each of the ungrounded conductors are using the single grounded conductor for a return to the transformer. Should the grounded conductor be interrupted and the is no return to the transformer via the grounded conductor then the return path is through the other ungrounded conductor and any load on that other ungrounded conductor path, This could and probably would create a problem if the total current flow exceeded the limit of one of the components in this new found path back to the transformer. Example a 10a. load on one ungrounded conductor and a 1a. load on the other conductor now become a total load of 11a. and the 1a. load (100w. bulb for instance) would not tolerate the flow of 11a. and the bulb would burn out.


George Little
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5