ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 381 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#96073 11/20/05 09:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
Paul,

I didn't say to violate the manufacturer's warranty. You must be thinking of another respondent.


Earl
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#96074 11/20/05 10:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
Bob,

I hear this misconception all the time. There is not a single AHJ who has supreme power over every thing you do. There are many AHJs who each have some authority over what we do for a living.

In CT, each local town will have the local AHJ (building official), and the State has the State Building Inspector, who the local AHJ may have to answer to.

The NEC references the AHJ as the person, organization or office that has authority over the electrical installation, such power often being granted by legislative act. (Article 100, check out the FPN)

Every job has multiple AHJs. (Even in Mass.) We all answer to the fire marshal, the electrical inspector, the building official, the licensing inspector, the insurance company and the tax collector. All of these are authorities having jurisdiction over some aspect of our work, often overlapping.


Earl
#96075 11/20/05 11:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Paul,
Quote
Surely, you would admit that when the electrical panel rusts out around a bonding connection you have defeated the simple defination of bonding.
And that would not have happened to the threads for the 10-32 screws that bond the listed equipment grounding bus to the panel?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
#96076 11/20/05 11:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Paul,
Quote
I just had a transformer that was installed 2 years ago and we relocated it. I noticed where the inspector at the time had required gouging the crap out of my electrical equipment had been done that rust had built up.
Given that transformer cases do not have manufacturer provided tapped holes to make the required bonding connection to the case, how do you make this connection?
Don

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 11-20-2005).]


Don(resqcapt19)
#96077 11/21/05 12:01 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
P
Member
I just read this thread for the first time. If I was a novice, my mind would have been going back and forth (like watching a tennis match), as both sides offer good arguments - but the bottom line is I would be confused as much as amused.

With that being said, I will add my 2 cents [Linked Image], Please let me add to the confusion/amusement.

Yes when the factory punches the enclosure, the dimple has more metal, and the factory threads will have more threads for connection.(tested and listed with the enclosure)

Adding a lug to the enclosure is permitted, as long as following the installation instructions, as the NEC is a permissive document, and I do not see where it directs one not to add a lug. That being said, the paint as per 250.12 is required to be removed to provide for lower contact resistance. Threading a field punched hole in the enclosure will not provide enough threads, so a nut and bolt connection should be provided - of course with the proper torquing [Linked Image].

"300.6(A)... and support hardware shall be suitably protected against corrosion inside and outside (except threads at joints) by a coating of APPROVED corrosion-resistant material." ... That does not say paint.

In this requirement, I do not see where it mentions that the protection has to be factory provided. Just that protection is necessary - approval is by the AHJ.


Add a lug, scrape the paint - exposing the metal surface, nut and bolt, and if the location is such that protection from deterioration is necessary, add an APPROVED material to protect the exposed enclosure.

Remember - JMHO


Pierre Belarge
#96078 11/25/05 01:28 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 56
P
Member
Don:

I would make that connection by drilling and taping 1/2-20 providing a lug and 2- 1/4 20 hex nuts to actually lock the connection tight to the threads and enclosure.

On the project we use a GE Mini Load Center with a 480/120/208 transformer with a 12 circuit panel all in one enclosure. That is exactly the way GE provides a ground attachment. That is less one hex nut. They only use one.

#96079 11/25/05 01:32 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 56
P
Member
Resqcapt:

I would say no since the tapped hole is installed by the manufacture and supposedly the panel has been tested by UL. Plus the fact that I don't recall ever seeing one rusted at the taps.

#96080 11/25/05 02:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Paul,
Quote
I would make that connection by drilling and taping 1/2-20 providing a lug and 2- 1/4 20 hex nuts to actually lock the connection tight to the threads and enclosure.
So the only metal to metal connection is the threads? There is no way that 1/4-20 threads have enough metal to metal contact in a field tapped hole to provide an adequate electrical connection. What is the gauge of the metal? The commonly used 10-32 screw only has ~2 threads engaged in field tapped holes in many types of electrical enclosures. The 1/4-20 would have less. If you don't clean the paint off of the enclosure this is the only current path. I don't see it as suitable.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
#96081 11/26/05 11:17 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 103
J
jes Offline
Member
This thread has been interesting with all the commentary on field mods for attaching a conductor to the enclosure...BUT, I am still back at the beginning wondering how comes an EGC larger than the panel will accomodate??? What is the panel mfg/model and the circuit specifics?? Just curious.

#96082 12/03/05 12:47 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 56
P
Member
Resqcapt:

I notice that you continue to tell me I am wrong but you still do not accurately quote the code. Whats up with that?

Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5