ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 564 guests, and 40 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
I would recommend using a metallic 90 at the pulling end to avoid the possibility of burn through, especially if you do ever pull into this raceway again. Just make sure the 90 has 18" of cover, (see 250.80) or stay with metal conduit to the panel or disconnect and use the proper bonding to the conduit.

Roger

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
Roger, using a metal 90 is a good idea! It is simply amazing how a wrap of tape eliminates corrosion problems, isn't it?

Winnie, I did not think "service entrance" as I tend to asociate "service" with "meter." This is, to be fair, a situation where the code can be read several different ways.

Bob, as far as the NEC is concerned, you're correct. However, where I am, the fire department likes the disconnect to be on the outside- for easy access. If it is not, then you're likely to need a 'shunt trip' arrangement. But I admit, it comes down to local rules.
I do like the panel inside; that's where the circuits will be, and I like it to be easy to run them. In other words, just one pipe coming through the wall- not everal small ones. It is a design preference.

Steve, I see that most of this you already know. I was a little detailed in my comments, since there are many reading this who don't have your background.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
Bob, I'm glad you grabbed the yoke to strear this back to the indended destination, kudo's.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
Winnie, notice the words "bonded to the grounding system in both buildings" when you speak of "metalic paths". If the phone, LAN or fence is not bonded to the system at both ends it is not a metalic path.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 650
W
Member
Learn something new...

Ya know, the 'no continuous metallic paths' stuck in my head, but the 'bonded to the grounding system' did not.

I'd argue that the fence _should_ be bonded, otherwise your setting yourself up for 'stray voltage', but I don't think that an external metallic structure is _required_ to be bonded by any code. Lots of LAN systems don't require a ground.

I guess metallic piping is the real killer here; everything else can have a pretty easy work-around.

Thanks for the correction!

-Jon

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
"Metal pipe"?
I have heard of this thing.

It was something they used to use back in the olden days, wasn't it?

[Linked Image]


Greg Fretwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5