ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 390 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
#93615 06/07/05 10:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
I believe that under the 2002 NEC a tie handle was not required for a multi-branch circuit. However in the 2005, I believe that it is going to change and a tie handle will now be required. Our state still follows the 2002 NEC for now.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#93616 06/09/05 06:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 345
T
Member
That multi wire branch circuit is only one circuit. For it to be two circuits you would have to run it with separate neutrals. Since the building will be served by only one branch circuit a grounding electrode system is not required.

Since the garage is on residential property you are allowed to use snap switches as the building disconnecting means. I favor the DPST approach but that is certainly not required.
--
Tom Horne

"This alternting current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use." Thomas Alva Edison


Quote
225.30 Number of Supplies.
Where more than one building or other structure is on the same property and under single management, each additional building or other structure served that is on the load side of the service disconnecting means shall be supplied by one feeder or branch circuit unless permitted in 225.30(A) through (E). For the purpose of this section, a multi wire branch circuit shall be considered a single circuit.
COPYRIGHT 2002 The National Fire Protection Association


Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison
#93617 06/09/05 10:19 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
Caper the 2005 just removed the "dwelling unit" language. The "same yoke" stayed the same. Now a commercial MW, landing on the same yoke needs a handle tie. If it splits out it doesn't.


Greg Fretwell
#93618 07/03/05 01:35 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 56
P
Member
I don't think so. If you look at the defination of a Branch circuit in Article 100 it states. The circuit conductors between the final overcurrent device protecting the circuit and the outlets.

I would tell the contractor it was ok to split the neutral on the two branch circuits but I would suggest he take a look at the requirements of 250.32.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5