ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by HotLine1 - 04/23/24 02:17 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 231 guests, and 11 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#93178 05/07/05 01:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
LOL [Linked Image]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#93179 05/07/05 01:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Ian How can I argue with a simple straight forward answer like that. [Linked Image]

I wish all NEC issues could be made as clear to me as that.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#93180 05/07/05 02:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 133
E
Member
Thanks Bob, but just curious do you think it could be argued that note 2 of table 250.66 would allow a #10 GEC for a 30 amp sub in a detached building?

#93181 05/07/05 04:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
No I do not believe note 2 will provide any relief in this instance.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#93182 05/07/05 04:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
I believe that, for a sub-panel, you're stuck with #8 to the ground rod. Remember, the ground rod is there for lightning, and has little to do with the service size.

The introduction to the code make it clear that the code is not a design manual, nor is it intended to allow for future growth, etc. With that in mind, I submit that, as a professional who is paid for his judgement as much as anything else, you should make these allowances, and exceed code minimums.

That is, run a big pipe -1" at least- and mount at least an A/C disconnect....at some future date, either the wire will go bad, or the customer will want more. How many garages are really workshops, after all? The $$$ for this improvement over code are minimal, and reap huge dividends down the line.
Or do you like digging? :-)

#93183 05/07/05 05:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
Bob, the operative question is "did you bond the fence?" If it is bonded at both ends you have a metalic path. Otherwise it is not an issue.
You can even make it more interesting. If the fence is now a wall with a footer (>20' of steel) do you have to stub up a grounding electrode conductor while the steel is "available"?


Greg Fretwell
#93184 05/07/05 05:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Greg

Quote
Bob, the operative question is "did you bond the fence?" If it is bonded at both ends you have a metalic path.

Yeah that is kind of a separate issue to what I was half joking about.

A simple breezeway connection between these buildings would change the rules.

Why wouldn't a wood fence do the same thing if connected to each building?

It is just an odd rule.

But as you said the rules are the rules. [Linked Image]

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#93185 05/08/05 01:03 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
I guess I actually try to see the hazard addressed when I look at rules. I can see "bonded" metalic paths being an issue because you are paralleling the neutral down that metalic path. If this is an unbonded piece of metal it is not really a path. The only path back is down the grounded wire in the 3 wire feeder.


Greg Fretwell
#93186 05/08/05 08:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
George
225.36 Exception :for Garages and outbuildings on RESIDENTIAL proprety a Snap switch or SET of 3way or 4 way snap switches Shall be PERMITTED as the disconnecting means.
So by that sentence why would Residential not apply????
So Why couldn't two Snap switchs be used as disconnects???Or even a 2 pole switch???
If this is a Mulit wire branch cicuit I feel there'd be no problem.

[This message has been edited by Yoopersup (edited 05-08-2005).]

[This message has been edited by Yoopersup (edited 05-08-2005).]

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5