ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 507 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
#92755 11/10/05 01:04 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
I'm sure we could get a wizzing match going on about who is the most qualified, engineers or building code officials.
It is like arguing that an engineer is the most qualified to quantify the velocity of mass over a given distance but if the cop says you are going 66 in a 55 you still get the ticket.


Greg Fretwell
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#92756 11/10/05 01:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 91
H
Member
Just curious..........how do you guys interpret 352.10(f) and 352.12(c) as it relates to this?

#92757 11/10/05 01:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 91
H
Member
You may also want to visit this website and read the section for article 230.
http://www.carlon.com/Documents/IntroGlobalChanges2005NEC.pdf

I know that it's not the same code article being argued here but I think that it adds good perspective.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5