ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 221 guests, and 11 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#90337 11/22/04 06:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Maybe I'm getting cranky in my old age but I have this pet peeve about people refering to 120/240 3 phase. If we look in IEEE dictionary we will find that the proper identification of voltage systems would be to label them with the higher voltage first and the lower voltage second if is a multi voltage 3 phase system. 240/120 3 phase is proper for a 3 phase system. 120/240 single phase would be proper for a multi voltage single phase system. Engineers foul this up constantly. I know the correct way of labeling it and I'm just a lowly electrical inspector. [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by George Little (edited 11-22-2004).]

[This message has been edited by George Little (edited 11-23-2004).]


George Little
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#90338 11/22/04 06:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Amen:

220.2 Computations.
(A) Voltages. Unless other voltages are specified, for purposes of computing branch-circuit and feeder loads, nominal system voltages of 120, 120/240, 208Y/120, 240, 347, 480Y/277, 480, 600Y/347, and 600 volts shall be used.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#90339 11/22/04 08:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 58
E
Member
George,
Your pet peeve is correct. I stand corrected: i.e. 480/277; 240/120; 208/120.
(In fact, I used to be more of a stickler for such things, but memory goes with age, I suppose. I can't remember)

#90340 11/28/04 09:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
Joe,

Not for nothing, but has anyone ever worked on a 347 volt system? I myself have worked on many differnet sytems but never a 347 volt one? My old boss even worked on stuff at different freq. I believe he worked on not just 60/50 hz but he also worked on stuff up to 400 hz. He did tell me that BOY, the 400 stuff really packed a punch when you got hit by that stuff.

#90341 11/28/04 10:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
C
Member
I believe the 347/600 volt services are common in Canada.


Peter
#90342 11/30/04 08:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
N
Member
120/208 3 phase 400 hz is standard aircraft power for most US made aircraft. Have worked on buildings that have motor generators to change the 60 hz to 400 hz to power the aircraft or associated equipment. Usually this is set up as a seperatly derived system but sometimes one 400 hz generator will feed more than 1 building.
And ya 400 hz bits worse than 60hz. [Linked Image]


ed
#90343 11/30/04 03:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
They used 400hz in big computer rooms since the 60s. It is getting phased out but you still see some.


Greg Fretwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5