ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 263 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#88469 06/08/04 10:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 333
S
Member
Earl, I can see your stance for multiple joists being drilled and the cables running through them all. My posts were towards the original post, which sounded like the cables only shared 1 hole at the plates above the panel.

steve


Steve
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#88470 06/09/04 08:25 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 178
R
Member
Earl how can you justify your interpitations based on...cables must be stacked or bundled for more than 24" before derating shall be enforced? Bored holes through wood framing are usually less than 24".If in fact we come through a hole and the wires aren`t bound together and are separated even if slightly they are separated and are not bundled for more than 24" sorry I just don`t get how they could be consitered bundled Can someone define bundled

#88471 06/09/04 08:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
That's just it. Bundling is not really defined, and, as someone pointed out, bundling is equated to running in a conduit. But what about the size of the conduit? Wouldn't 6 #12s in a two inch conduit have enough room to shed heat? At the least much more than the same 6 #12s in a 1/2 inch conduit. It is this lack of differentiation that leads me (and other inspectors) to err on the side of caution and intrepret installing cables in bored holes further than 24 inches as bundling.

Cheer up, as I stated earlier, you can run 4 cables in all your holes. When you do the math, the derated cables meet code. #14s go to 15 amp breakers, #12s go to 20 amp breakers, and #10s go to 30 amp breakers.

Most electricians will use a 7/8 inch drill bit to limit this automatically.(it's tough to force 5 NM cables into the hole) And, when drilling 2 x 4 studs, the hole will be centered 1-1/4 inch back from either edge. (1/8 inch fudge factor)

Earl


Earl
#88472 06/10/04 06:40 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 650
W
Member
Just addressing the '6 #14 in a 2" conduit versus 6 #2s in the same conduit'...

A while back I spent some time figuring the heat dissipation from conductors at their maximum current rating. The interesting thing is that the heat produced per unit length goes up very slowly as the wires get bigger.

Simply take the current squared and multiply by ohms per foot:
wire 60C A mO/ft Watt/ft
14ga 20 3.07 1.228 (note 240.4(D) )
10ga 30 1.21 1.089
6ga 55 0.491 1.485
2ga 95 0.194 1.751

All of the heat generated has to leave the conduit, so it doesn't matter if the wires are small relative to the conduit size or large relative to the conduit size; all that matters is that the total heat produced in the conduit is suitably low.

-Jon

#88473 06/10/04 08:39 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28
C
Member
NEC Article 520-2. Definitions. Bundled. Cables or conductors that are physically tied, wrapped, taped, or otherwise periodically bound together.

this is what i found in my 99nec..02 is with a friend.... so depending on ones IQ, there could probably be 36,482 definitions of bundling or more! LOL...NEC needs to address this big time, as well as many many other issues in the NEC ...why not put the def. of bundled/bundling in the front with the others?

#88474 06/10/04 09:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
G
Member
winnie ----

I use different numbers:

wire 60C A mO/ft Watt/ft
14ga 15 3.13 0.70
12ga 20 1.98 0.79
6ga 50 0.49 1.23
4ga 66 0.31 1.35 (66 is a strange amp)

2" PVC conduit dissipates 12.1 watt/ft (based on 15 4ga - 9 current carrying)

This allows (current carrying conductors) 17 14ga, 15 12ga, or 10 6ga (based on heat dissipation) WITH NO DERATING FROM THE ABOVE AMPS.

#88475 06/12/04 09:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
Those interested in this topic should obtain a copy of the September/October 2003 issue of IAEI magazine.
A study was done with several cables routed through a double 2 x 4 stud plate and an additional 1 x 4 (total thickness 3 1/2") and loaded from 60 to 80% ampacities.
Throughout the day, depending on outdoor temperatures, the temperature rise of the conductors exceeded the allowable temperatures of the NM cables.
The results more involved than I can go into right now, but maybe someone can obtain permission to reprint the article.
It's interesting stuff.

#88476 06/12/04 10:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
G
Member
Redsy ---

My residence (2000sqft, 200amp) houses my wife's business. The load include 6 computers and electric heat.

The 8 hour load is less than 34amp @120 volt (about 4KW).

If that load were on only 3 20amp circuits, the circuits would be loaded to only 50%.

I think that loading used in the tests might be a bit high for residences.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5