ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 263 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 133
E
Member
Hello folks, I'm new to this group and look forward to exchanging information with fellow Electrical professionals. The questions I have are:
When performing calculations for a residential service, should an allowance be made for garage door openers as fixed appliances in accordance with 220.17?
What about ceiling fans? should any allowance be made for these beyond general lighting?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 615
J
Member
I recently did a load calc. and started scratching my head over the same load. My local inspector (who is a real code connoisseur and a great gut to go to if you want to chew the code)says yes. Figure the garage door openers as fixed appliances.

When I expressed my concerns with the vagueness of that section of the code as well as feeling that the load calc. section is a little outdated, he whole-heartedly agreed and thinks the who section needs an overhaul.

I didn't get his opinion about ceiling fans because it was already of my opinion to not list ceiling fans as fixed appliances. I figured they were included in the general lighting allowance of 3 VA per sq. ft.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 133
E
Member
Thanks, I think it makes sense that the Garage door openers are included. The ceiling fan can make for an interesting discussion though. I have a situation were there are only 3 appliances to consider and thus cannot apply the 75% demand. However, if I consider the ceiling fan an appliance, I now have the 4 or more fixed appliances necessary to allow application of the 75% demand. This results in a smaller load than if the fan is not included. So, there are situations where it may be advantagous to consider the ceiling fans as fixed appliances. For those who may argue that these fans are considered part of the general lighting load, I would ask why then is it that the only specific reference to ceiling fans is in article 422 APPLIANCES?
Specifically article 422.18.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 615
J
Member
good point

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 717
M
Member
If this is any help, most newer garage door opener systems draw around 2-3 amps. I used to run a dedicated 20 amp circuit out to the opener as a matter of course, just because I was taught that was the way to do it by other companies I worked for back in the helper days. My current trend is still for a dedicated circuit, but now its a 15 amp one run with # 14. For my 2 cents, its general lighting load at 3 watts per sq. ft.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
P
Member
Mike
The only situation with your response is 220.3(A)(1) does not count the garage as part of the general lighting load. Sounds to me like this inspector knows what he is talking about!

Pierre


Pierre Belarge
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Are we just kicking this around for fun?

I mean is any service sized so close that a garage door opener is going to make a difference?

If the answer is yes, is anyone changing a service when they add an outlet for a new 15 or 20 amp circuit for reasons other than lack of physical space in the panel?

I can not remember ever hearing of a service main tripping from overload.

Ground faults, short circuits sure but not an overload.

All I am saying is, aren't we over thinking this?


[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 02-14-2004).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
G
Member
iwire ---

When I think of appliances I think items that draw enough to require their own circuit.

Even a 1650w electric fry pan or microwave don't make appliances in my book.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 615
J
Member
iwire,

I know where you're coming from. If you take a step back and look at it that way, it may seem like splitting hairs. But I think the acual problem needs to have a second look also by taking a step back. I really feel there is so much haze in figuring these for residential that there is plenty of room to make a mistake.

I guess it is the NEC's vagueness & ambiguity that gives me so little confidence in a load calc.'s end result. I'm not so sure a mistake would make a difference either way. It kind of makes the whole formality feel kind of pointless.

Of course obviously there is a real point to doing an accurate load calc., but I have yet to find one that I can feel confident with. Or maybe I just need to know, trust, and understand the NEC's way better.

I guess I want to be able to come up with a number and say "this is your load". A number that I felt confident was not too far on either side of the line figuring too much or too little. But maybe it's just the nature of the beast. Because of diversity and demand factors it is too difficult if not impossible to have that theroretical or calculated number that is an accurate representation of the actual real load.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Broom Pusher and
Member
The thread regarding Kitchen Appliance Circuits might shed some light on this particular thread, and the possibilities of underkill or overkill for service sizing.

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5