ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 235 guests, and 27 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
i see the problem, yet am fuzzy on a fix for it.

would a definition help?

meanwhile, it would be ashame to have brighter students balk at a loaded Q here.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
T
Member
Quote
brighter students

Decrease the voltage...

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Power systems are rated for nominal voltages such as: 120, 208, 240, 480, and 600V. These voltages are specified by ANSI and have been the "correct" voltages to use since the early 1950's.

110.4 says in part "...nominal voltage of a circuit..."

220.2 says "Unless other voltages are specified, for purposes of computing... nominal voltages ... shall be used."

Motors are rated for utilization voltages (they allow for voltage drop from nominal) of: 115, 200, 230, 460, and 575V. These are the nameplate voltages referred to in Articles 430 and 440.

In my opinion, the question was intended to test the knowledge of the formula (va = volts x amps). Art 220.2 gives the writer the authority to specify the voltage (yes it appears to be a trick question).

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 15
E
Member
Isn’t the whole point of 220.2(A) to make us use nominal voltages for computations?

Wouldn’t the “Unless other voltages are specified” refer to other voltage systems not listed at the end of this section? (not any arbitrary voltage by any entity)


[This message has been edited by engy (edited 08-07-2003).]

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
When we figure what the VA is per outlet (strap), the result is less than 180 VA. Section 220.3(B)(9) indicates that the minimum per strap is 180VA.

20 x 115 = 2300 VA 2300VA/13 = 176.9 or 177 VA per outlet, less than the required 180VA


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Joe,
I did my calculation at 180 va per strap. I just chose to do the calculation in a manner where the code clearly permits rounding. Even if I do it like this, I still get a 20 amp "code" load.
13 x 180va = 2340 va 2340va/115v = 20.348 amps. The code permits me to drop the .348 amps giving me a "code" load of 20 amps which is permitted on a 20 amp circuit.
As I told Roger, we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. I will insist that 13 are permitted until someone can show me a code rule that says 2340 va is not permitted by the code on a 115 volt, 20 amp circuit.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
It may be worth noting that for receptacle branch circuits, utilization equipment is of two types. Loads can be constant-resistance or constant kVA—corresponding to heating/incandescent-lighting and inductive/motor loads. The point is—within limits—resistive-load current increases with increasing line voltage, and inductive-load current decreases with increasing voltage. Equipment nameplates usually list 115V, nominal system voltage is 120V, [and the wiring-device rating is 125V.]

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5