ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 390 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 15
E
Member
"I will stand fast with my interpretation and will look for your proposal in the 2008 NEC."

...which is exactly what this boils down to. The AHJ has the final word right or wrong. (a devisive issue indeed) I happen to agree with Don for whatever that is worth. I don't think that because you find one bad worst-case example (photo) that you throw the baby out with the bathwater and declare prohibition on splicing EGC's in a panel. I don't think a EGC needs to be continuous like GEC's. If I'm on a job and don't have a ground bar, I would like to think I am not jeopardizing practical safgaurding by splicing a couple of grounds together because I don't want to double up grounds on the bar.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 29
R
Member
And I thought interpretation of nuclear radiogical controls policies and practices was bad. I feel your pain.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
G
Gwz Offline
Member
Would the case of 'terminal bar' vs 'terminal bars' for grounding conductors of 408.20 be better served if the wording was " grounding terminal bar(s)" ?

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5