ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 470 guests, and 9 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
G
Gwz Offline
Member
The CMP will need to change their mindset on the identification of the GEC.

See 1992 TCR proposal 5-206 on page 176.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
We may not have access to that Glenn, what 'did' they say?

I have a hard time believing a CMP would entertain this obvious shortcut;

Quote
using conductors with green insulation as ungrounded (hot) conductors by phase tapping the insulation

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
Can someone please tell me or give me a reason why everything to do with grounding or bonding including the GEC should not be allowed to be green or bare.

As Sparky points out, anybody that would not know the difference is more of a danger concerning other things, than not identifying a GEC correctly.

The time debated over indentifying different parts of a grounding and bonding system could be better spent elsewhere. IMHO

Roger

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 246
R
Member
What was the committee's response to this submittal? I sure didn't pick up on the possibality of affecting the GEC.

I'm sure Phil did not mean for this article to affect the GEC articles. For the reasons he states, it is a good change.

Hopefully someone on the committee had the same insight that Joe, and others here, had about how this would affect the GEC. If not, then this is where one should make a comment on the proposals, which, I would think, is an option available to anyone here who wishes to.

Anyone know of the timeline for comments?

Rick Miell

[This message has been edited by rmiell (edited 05-25-2003).]

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Thanks Glenn:

Here's your proposal.

[Linked Image from joetedesco.com]

Rick" Here is the schedule:
Quote
2005 National Electrical Code® Schedule
(2004 NFPA World Safety Congress & Exposition™)


Date
Event


November 1, 2002
(5 PM EST) Receipt of Proposals

January 13-25, 2003
Code-Making Panel Meetings (ROP) (Hilton Head, SC)

April 28 - May 2, 2003
Correlating Committee Meeting

July 11, 2003
ROP to Mailing House

October 31, 2003
(5 PM EST) Receipt of Comments


December 1-13, 2003
Code-Making Panel Meetings (ROC) (San Diego, CA)

February 23-27, 2004
Correlating Committee Meeting

April 8, 2004
ROC to Mailing House

May 23-27, 2004
NFPA World Safety Congress and Exposition™ (Salt Lake City, Utah)

July 2004
Standards Council Issuance


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
C
C-H Offline
Member
iwire,
Quote

In the area of the States I work green with yellow stripe is used for indicating isolated ground conductors.

I didn't think of that... It was just an idea. As I'm not in the United States, I'm not entitled to have an opinion on the NEC, really.

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
Member
Well the same could be said for me C-H, but...... [Linked Image]

Quote

Can someone please tell me or give me a reason why everything to do with grounding or bonding including the GEC should not be allowed to be green or bare.
I second Roger's comment. Why not just specify that all grounding & bonding be green and that green shall not be used for any other purpose? That seems to be the logical approach to me.

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 552
T
Member
Quote
Why not just specify that all grounding & bonding be green and that green shall not be used for any other purpose?

Paul, you are familiar enough with the NEC to know that wouldn't be confusing enough to make it into the codebook ! [Linked Image]


Donnie
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 15
E
Member
“The proposed wording says that any conductor "identified as permitted" in this section shall only be used as an EGC. The use of a bare wire is permitted to identify an EGC, this will mean that bare conductors are no longer permitted to be used as grounding electrode conductors.”

I will disagree.

1) A completely bare conductor is not “identified” as in 250.119 A or B. They are referring to insulated conductors that are stripped bare for the entire EXPOSED length. To identify something you have to do something to it.

2) Nothing in the substantiation points to this. The intent is if it’s green or green w/ yellow stripe – it’s an EGC only.


[This message has been edited by engy (edited 06-06-2003).]

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5