ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 391 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Don:

Sounds good and with my comment the issues are resolved??

sparky:

The substantiation will be satisfied if the change in the rule is included in the 2005 NEC.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
I can't understand why it is that smaller conductor identification gained so much notoriety in the 02' while larger conductors fare poorly here.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
C-H

In the area of the States I work green with yellow stripe is used for indicating isolated ground conductors.

The manufacturers of cables(green and a green with yellow stripe) and UPS equipment (at least some) also use green with yellow stripe for isolated grounds.

What do use in your area for isolated ground identification or do you even install IG conductors?

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
sparky:

I need more information on what you are describing.



[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 05-24-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Edited to stay on topic

Bob

[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 05-24-2003).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Joe,
changes in art 200.7(C)(2) had people running a 3 wire for switch loops, because of the 'permanently reidentified' line debated ad nasuem.

Now the same brewhaha is going to befall the GEC ?

it seems the CMP(s) have beat up the identification issue randomly throughout the last few code cycles.

IMO, if one has trouble identifying a GEC or switch loop, they should'nt be wearing a tool belt anyways.....

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
P
Member
sparky: no truer words can be spoken!!
I think I saw something where a proposal called for a true neutral "white wire" in a switch. I think that's good and I would recommend it anyway.

The new 2005 cycle should be very interesting, and I will be sending in comments to support the one above too.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
G
Member
I think Sparky's last post speaks for alot of field electricians.

[This message has been edited by ga.sparky56 (edited 05-25-2003).]

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
P
Member
Do you think that the code panel will allow the use of green for the grounding electrode conductor if this proposal is accepted?

Seems to me that it will not, and the issue and case is closed concerning the long winded remarks by more than one person here a few months ago.

I could not find that thread, and if anyone knows where it is kindly post the link here, or was it deleted by the Moderator??

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
P
Member
iwire:

Isn't that why two EGC's are included in certain types of MC Cable, one is "Green" and the other is "Green with a Yellow Stripe?"

You are correct, we don't need to use the green with the yellow stripe for the GEC identification.


[This message has been edited by pseudonym (edited 05-25-2003).]

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5