ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (CoolWill), 250 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#84368 03/25/03 07:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6
G
gbbrwh Offline OP
Junior Member
I have an energy guiding drag chain that needs to be modified. My solution is to parallel two #8 conductors (for power not control.)
I am required to follow NEC in this modification and 310.4 pretty much destroys my options.
Does anybody know anyway of bypassing 310.4 based on the fact that this is a drag chain? Or are there any better ideas?

Thanx ... Richard

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#84369 03/25/03 10:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
R
Ron Offline
Member
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a energy guiding drag chain?


Ron
#84370 03/26/03 11:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6
G
gbbrwh Offline OP
Junior Member
http://www.wampfler.us/INDEX.asp?lang=2&page=31,1,3&zuf=0.6372517867116791
http://www.kabelschlepp.com/quantum.htm

#84371 03/26/03 11:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
R
Ron Offline
Member
Great links, although I still don't follow the application. The energy guiding drag chain seems to be a flexible cable tray that moves with an operator.
If you need 80 amperes of conductor (parallel #8awg), what prohibits you from using #3awg instead of paralleling #8 (which as you mentioned is not permitted)?


Ron
#84372 03/26/03 12:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6
G
gbbrwh Offline OP
Junior Member
http://www.portofoakland.com/pdf/mari_reso_crane_02.pdf

If you look at the above link, this crane is in its operating condition. When it returns to its stowed position, the boom retracts away from the water - the energy chain moves with it.
The energy chain is already in place on the crane and these chains require to be load balanced and careful design goes into them. We have no other conductors available other than the #8 AWG. If I cannot use them, I will have to remove the chain.

Thanks for your help ... Richard

#84373 03/26/03 02:36 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
gbbrwh — Ron has given you accurate information. Is there any way the load could be divided so that part of it was left on the presently-energized set of 8AWG conductors and part on the 8AWG spares?

#84374 03/26/03 02:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 360
T
Member
I think I understand, the chain comes premade with the cables already in it. There isn't any wire existing with the capacity to do what he needs to do.

If this is required to code, your stuck, unless there is room in the chain to add some welding cable, (to give you the flex you need) into the chain.

good luck, did you spec the chain? or did some engineer do it.

TW

#84375 03/26/03 03:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6
G
gbbrwh Offline OP
Junior Member
Yes - the chain arrives premade with the cables installed. The chain was getting so heavy and wide, we had to remove numerous spare conductors before it was built.
One simple mistake has led to this problem. All we have left are the #8s and various #10s and #12s. We can't split the load. The only option I can think of is to parallel two #8s together - otherwise the chain has to come back down and sent back to the factory in Germany [Linked Image]
Adding a cable would be difficult as these chains are designed in such a way to avoid cables contacting one another.
An engineer I know spec'd it but the responsibility falls right at my door.

#84376 03/26/03 03:54 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
I would try it and see just how currents share. Sometimes "engineering supervision” can justify practices that aren't exactly what everyone is used to in industrial facilities. It's not perfectly code compliant, but It may not kill anyone or damage anything. Careful documentation is in order to "CYA" and lessen confusion to future troubleshooters. It would be a deviation, but unquestionably in a “location accessible to qualified persons only” and “In industrial establishments… where conditions of maintenance and supervision ensure that only qualified personnel are involved” that the NEC uses to justify special cases.

#84377 03/26/03 04:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Gbbrwh:
Have you called your local AHJ?????
You have a piece of industrial equipment.
Your link states it was made in 1968

The #8's that you have in the track; what kind of wire/cable and what insulation??

Talk to your local AHJ! Explain the facts of the situation to him... Certain situations can receive "special permission", but get it in writing.

IF you presented your situation to me, and had engineering documentation to "back-it-up" more than likely, I would grant special permission.

John


Your link also mentions 4160 volt as the power supply, is that correct.


John
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5