Joe,
I admit to having no knowledge of the way in which the code panels come to their decisions, and I'm sure that you were already aware that although I have worked in the U.S.A. it was not in a field which required knowledge of the NEC. That's why I started my post the way I did.....
However, surely the original question was whether using green for the GEC is a violation of the (2002) NEC,
as published.
If an AHJ adopts the NEC, surely they do so only on the basis of what is written in the publication? (Plus any written amendments they have the authority to make.)
Can an inspector working strictly to the NEC cite a violation on the basis of what he
believes the panel meant to say, or what he thinks they
should have said? Surely he can only pass or fail on the basis of what is actually
written in the rules? I seem to recall several discussions to this effect in the past.
Like many of the other posters in this thread, I just don't see any way to interpret the specific codes you cited as prohibiting the use of green for a GEC.
If I'm missing something or there is another section I should be reading which could in some way modify 250.119 et al, then please point me toward it -- I am trying to study sections of the NEC as and when I get the chance in order to learn more!