ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 250 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
#79092 11/28/01 07:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19
D
DUBLIN Offline OP
Member
State of Wisconsin not adopting the use of arc fault breakers at least for the upcoming 2002 - 2005 period. Any others out there holding off as well. Any thoughts on the subject pros cons.


| )ubli| |
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#79093 11/28/01 08:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
I like the idea of holding off for a while. For the time being offer AFCI protection as an option. After a few years, a track record will exist. Also, the costs probably will have dropped. I don't know if, during a service upgrade, you can convince a customer to foot the extra $200-300 for something most of the competition probably won't insist on anyway.
New construction though, absolutely.

#79094 11/28/01 11:43 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Why do we need this product for new construction. Are our wiring methods so poor that we must provide additional protection for the fixed wiring of the building. If this requirement was for the protection of portable wiring, it would make much more sense to me. The code requires branch circuit protection and most of the branch circuit AFCIs provide only limited protection for the portable wiring. Are we admitting that most of the electrical fires in new construction start as a result of faults in the fixed wiring???????? If so we need to change the wiring methods. Maybe Chicago's all conduit code isn't so silly after all.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#79095 11/28/01 12:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Dublin,

What I've heard (from a UL rep) basically supports what Don is saying about limited protection to items past the fixed wiring system. I think the problem is in the sensitivity and testing standards in effect. It's ironic that it will be required (here) only in New Construction and not Remodel Jobs (unless more than 50% is renovated)

(What if that 50% does not include the Bedrooms ?? - hmm, not sure [Linked Image] )

Bill


Bill
#79096 11/28/01 12:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
My statement regarding new construction was in regard to conforming to the code. Not necessarily agreeing with it.

#79097 11/29/01 08:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
There was a recent IAEI article per UL1699,on AFCI's. One section stated the listing was for new branch circuits only.
This surprised me as I am being told to AFCI all bed & living area outlets during a service upgrade here in VT. (Yes I know, the NEC is'nt retroactive..)

In asking UL, the listing is supposively being altered for 'old work'. And they are less effective on older circuitry at best.

It's nice to have rationale follow NEC changes, makes it easier to pedal as an end installer/marketer/justifier than simply saying 'because it's code...'. [Linked Image]

#79098 11/29/01 10:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19
D
DUBLIN Offline OP
Member
I try not to ever just say "because it's code". much more professional to say 'this is a code requirement because...." At least this is how I try to explain to the customer, you'd be surprised how much their confidence level in you increases.Besides it drives me nuts, and my helpers and apprentices never say that particular phrase because they know I'll ask why. And I think that drives them nuts. Aren't our jobs great or what.


| )ubli| |
#79099 11/30/01 06:07 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Then to be totally honest,

This is a code requirement because the manufacturers want to sell expensive breakers on the premis of safety.

#79100 11/30/01 03:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Search the internet for Consumer Product Safety Commission
Preventing Home Fires: Arc Fault Circuit Interrupters (AFCIs)



[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 12-07-2001).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#79101 11/30/01 05:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Joe,
So you and the CPSC are saying that our installation and wiring methods for the fixed wiring in new dwelling units are so poor that these fires are occurring in the fixed building wiring?
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5