ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 463 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
#77885 07/22/01 04:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
Quote
Originally posted by resqcapt19:
Redsey,
The #14 tails are taps and a code violation if connected to a duplex receptacle. However I highy doubt that a 30 amp load on a #14 would get anywhere near hot enough to cause a fire.
Don(resqcapt19)

I agree with you about not causing a fire. After all, the ampacity per 310-16 is actually 25 amps (90 deg.column). However, I have felt(by hand) noticeable heat on a #12 that was running a continuous 18 amps.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#77886 07/23/01 08:19 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Redsy,
You will feel heat. You have to remember that when you load a conductor to its full NEC ampacity, the conducotr will operate at the temperature in the ampacity table. 60°C is 140°F and that is hot to the touch.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
#77887 08/18/01 01:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3
M
Junior Member
I agree with Don(resqcapt19).
Check out this graphic.

1999 NEC Code Graphic
Branch Circuit Tap Conductors, Section 210-19(d) Exception 1c
Understanding the 1999 National Electrical Code- (29KB) 2/7/00
http://www.mikeholt.com/graphics/210-19dx1c.gif

[This message has been edited by Mike W (edited 08-18-2001).]

#77888 08/18/01 01:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3
M
Junior Member
Sorry, I made a fat finger.
Title of graphic is :
Branch Circuit Tap Conductors, Section 210-19(d) Exception 1c
Understanding the 1999 National Electrical Code- (29KB) 2/7/00

#77889 09/15/01 01:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6
S
Junior Member
You can legally load a #14 thhn conductor to 35 amps. In Table 310-16, If the conductor is operating in an ambient temperature between 70-77 degrees F. or 21-25 C. You can appy a correction factor of 1.4 to the 25 amps under the 90 degree column. Although the LoadCenter probably wouldn't be operating in this environment, and all conductors must be sized to highest temperature it will see, but the code does show that we can use this formula for derating. Am I wrong here?

#77890 09/15/01 07:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
Quote
Originally posted by SirJaxx:
You can legally load a #14 thhn conductor to 35 amps. In Table 310-16, If the conductor is operating in an ambient temperature between 70-77 degrees F. or 21-25 C. You can appy a correction factor of 1.4 to the 25 amps under the 90 degree column. Although the LoadCenter probably wouldn't be operating in this environment, and all conductors must be sized to highest temperature it will see, but the code does show that we can use this formula for derating. Am I wrong here?
The asterisk in T310-16 refers to 240-3 which limits OCPD to 15 amps for #14. The exceptions don't include general purpose branch circuit wiring, which I believe is the idea in this thread. When using #14, The 90 deg. column is only usable for derating purposes, but still won't allow higher ampacity due to 240-3(d).



[This message has been edited by Redsy (edited 09-15-2001).]

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5