|
0 members (),
390
guests, and
14
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
|
Tom, Do you fuse your fixtures when you do this?
Guys, look across the page @ Table 210-21(b)(3). You can't put a 15 amp recp on a 30 amp circ. unless as Tom pointed out, you are supplying Electric Discharge lighting with mogul-base screw shell lampholders.
[This message has been edited by electure (edited 07-20-2001).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Member
|
Look at 210-19(b). You can't use a tap to feed a duplex outlet. Note that a duplex is two receptacles. The branch circuit rating is equal to the OCPD rating. If the rating is 20 amps then the smallest conductor permited is #12. Don(resqcapt19)
Don(resqcapt19)
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So why can you put a 15 A receptacle on a 20 A circuit but you can't feed it with a 15 A pigtail in the box?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Member
|
Originally posted by Dspark: So why can you put a 15 A receptacle on a 20 A circuit but you can't feed it with a 15 A pigtail in the box? Only on multi-outlet branches are 15 amp receptacles allowed on 20 amp ckts. I'm guessing the reason is that most equipment that would draw in excess of 15 amp would have a 20 amp plug, and not be able to be inserted anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Member
|
Electure,
No fusing involved. We're looking at 2- 2 1/2 feet of cord & about 6 inches of "tap" conductor to the receptacle. Tripping th OCPD for this type of circuit with a ground fault or short circuit should not be a problem. This is more or less the equivalent of the zip cord that goes to a table lamp & is plugged into a 20 amp circuit.
Tom
[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 07-20-2001).]
Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
Member
|
T210-24, under 'Circuit Rating' says Taps, ampacities of which are given to the right, substaintially less that the OCPD's above. exactly what application does "Taps" refer to here?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7
OP
Junior Member
|
The electrician I was working with would cut #14 into 6" pig tails and slice it to #12 wire and the 15 amp switch or outlet, he said they let you do this? If the device is rated at only 15 amps why not? this was on a 20 amp breaker by the way. Is this not a tap?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 43
Member
|
Originally posted by Jim W: The electrician I was working with would cut #14 into 6" pig tails and slice it to #12 wire and the 15 amp switch or outlet, he said they let you do this? If the device is rated at only 15 amps why not? this was on a 20 amp breaker by the way. Is this not a tap? Isn't it necessary to use an overcurrent device rated to protect the smallest wire in the circuit (as in smallest ampacity?)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Member
|
Originally posted by Jim W: The electrician I was working with would cut #14 into 6" pig tails and slice it to #12 wire and the 15 amp switch or outlet, he said they let you do this? If the device is rated at only 15 amps why not? this was on a 20 amp breaker by the way. Is this not a tap? If someone plugged 2 appliances that each drew 14 amps into the receptacle (may be unlikely, but..) the insulation on the pigtails could overheat and start a fire, particularly if installed on combustible materials. My vote is that these are not taps as intended by the code.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Member
|
Redsey, The #14 tails are taps and a code violation if connected to a duplex receptacle. However I highy doubt that a 30 amp load on a #14 would get anywhere near hot enough to cause a fire. Don(resqcapt19)
Don(resqcapt19)
|
|
|
Posts: 5,445
Joined: January 2005
|
|
|
|
|