ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
UL 508A SPACING
by ale348 - 03/29/24 01:09 AM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 382 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
A difference of opinion has come up in my local area as to whether NM cable can be installed in a conduit sleeve on the outside of a building - or must it be UF?

Assuming that the conduit system is installed to be raintight what are the opinions on this situation?


Bill
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
Member
Bill, my OPINION is that the conductors should be rated for wet location. (Frank) cinkerf

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Frank,

Is UF (sleeved in conduit) used in your area to run from a panel up the side of a House to the attic? If NM cable has, by construction, an overall jacket (unbroken) that is moisture resistant and the conduit as run is arranged to drain would you think this was an acceptable practice?


Bill
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 15
P
pip Offline
Member
i don't believe the conduit is considered a wet location. Maybe damp,but, not wet. We run thhn in conduit every day out side. You might call your local inspector if there is an inspection, however I believe it to be o.k.

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
Member
Bill,
UF cable in conduit run up the side of house to attic is a common and acceptable practice. I have no problem with regular NM cable (romex) either. As you mentioned, the overall jacket is moisture resistant. Obviously, the UF cable would be my first choice. However, I couldn't imagine an Inspector rejecting the regular NM cable.

pip,
THHN conductors are usually "dual" rated THHN / THWN. THWN is rated for wet locations per section 310.8(c)(2). As you pointed out, it's always best to check with your local Inspector.


(Frank) cinkerf

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Frank,

In our Area there are a number of Agencies approved for Electrical Inspection Services. Is this common elsewhere?

It seems that one of the Agencies is requiring that UF be used when sleeved inside any conduit in outside locations. I do not have any details if it is without exception. Obviously someone that wishes to use NM could always go to one of the other Agencies for Approval. I was just wondering if UF was required in any other Locations around the Country?


Bill
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
Member
Bill,

We have one AHJ within our major City. Beyond the City limits there are several other Electrical Inspection Agencies that I'm aware of.

TECHNICALLY, UF cable, not regular NM cable is required within conduit in outside locations. The justification is that the outside location is considered a wet location. (At least in my area) However, as I mentioned in my previous post, the use of NM cable in this application is commonly accepted and approved.

(Frank) cinkerf

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
You may have a topic that has a difference between it's "code" and "practical" applications here...it happens......I am told there are instances were I will not be compliant no matter what....

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
Member
Sparky,
There is always the possibility that a group of Inspectors will have a difference of opinion on a particular code item even if they all work for the same Electrical Inspection Agency. Unless the Agency, as a whole, requires a certain code rule to be enforced 100% the Electrical Inspector has the authority to exercise section 90.4 providing "effective safety is maintained".
I'm personally grateful our Industry has such a professional, well respected document as the NEC. Taking time to study the code and ask questions is time well spent.

(Frank) cinkerf

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
No flames here, many times i'm glad to have the AHJ make the call! Here's a good example pertinent to this thread [Linked Image]
I do many underground services, no matter how well i clean & glue the pvc, it'll take on water, i've never seen an underground run stay dry, even though it could technically be called "dry" [Linked Image]
So i simply install URD direct burial in pipe, assuming that, given frost, expansion etc., that it will be wet. [Linked Image]
Another good one is a gas station job, in which there were many runs of rigid. One of the larger runs which came up out of the ground and ran along the building , had to have a special "wick" fitting. This wrench tight assembly, which could have been submerged for all of me, needed to have a way to rid itself of condensation accumulated within itself. [Linked Image] I really never even knew of the latter gizmo, i'll just say it sure pays to do some asking [Linked Image]

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5