ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 474 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
I've seen the OSHA letter ruling, where they decided to apply 'pendant' rules to such extension cords.

The NEC only requires the boxes to have threaded hubs. I believe that ordinary "Bell" boxes comply.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 91
H
Member
Quote
The NEC only requires the boxes to have threaded hubs. I believe that ordinary "Bell" boxes comply.
We have hundreds of these around here and that's the way the inspectors enforce it. See 314.23(G)1 . We use "bell" boxes too.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
S
Member
Quote
314.23(H)(1): A box shall be supported from a multiconductor cord or cable in an approved manner that protects the conductors against strain, such as a strain-relief connector threaded into a box with a hub.

As I read this, it doesnt' require a box with a hub; that is simply a suggested method to achieve the required strain relief. As far as I can tell, a Kellems grip achieves equivalent strain relief when used with a four-square box, and thus meets the requirements of this code provision.

There are thousands of FS boxes hanging around here in the labs of Silicon Valley. laugh

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
I suspect this would get back to whether a locknut on a fitting in a KO is evaluated for a box where the wiring method and box is not secured in place. It will come down to a NRTL opinion if this gets escalated.
I can see this twisting and loosening up a locknut a lot easier that a fitting screwed into a hub wrench tight.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Quote
That's just the point, there is no written code prohibiting this.
I disagree, you just have not run into this before.

Keep in mind OSHA (at least in my experience) has a much different perspective when applying rules than we do.

In other words they have no problem stretching and straining the rules to suit their needs.

The section OSHA can cite about using a 4" square like this is here from the Occupational Safety and Health Standards.

Quote
1910.303(b)(1)(i)
Suitability for installation and use in conformity with the provisions of this subpart. Suitability of equipment for an identified purpose may be evidenced by listing or labeling for that identified purpose.
and here for construction sites

Quote
1926.403(b)(1)(i)

Suitability for installation and use in conformity with the provisions of this subpart. Suitability of equipment for an identified purpose may be evidenced by listing, labeling, or certification for that identified purpose.
Here is an OSHA Standard Interpretation that puts their view is perspective. They are taking about job made extension cords but rest assured they will consider the cord drops we make as job made extension cords.

It's long but I made some key parts bold.

Quote
• Standard Number: 1910.305(a)(2)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 17, 1992

MEMORANDUM FOR: LINDA R. ANKU
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

FROM: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT: Acceptable Job-Made Extension Cords

This is in reference to your memorandum of June 12, 1991 to your area directors and district supervisors on the subject of extension cords acceptable for use (copy attached). We believe your interpretation is unduly restrictive and that it does not accurately reflect the requirements of the applicable standards. We have prepared the following analysis, which indicates that shop-made extension cords and other temporary wiring is acceptable in certain circumstances. It is not required in all circumstances that an extension cord be approved as an assembly.

Analysis

Normally, electrical equipment must be approved as an assembly by a nationally recognized testing laboratory to be acceptable under the General Industry or Construction Electrical Standards (Part 1910, Subpart S and Part 1926, Subpart K, respectively).

However, it is also true that cord sets, assembled in the field by qualified persons, are appropriately used in both general industry and in the construction industry, under limited circumstances. Such cord sets are considered to be temporary wiring extensions of the branch circuit.

Temporary electrical power and lighting wiring methods, as specified in 1910.305(a)(2) and 1926.405(a)(2), may be of a class less than that required for a permanent installation. Thus, temporary electrical power and lighting installations are permitted during the period of construction, remodeling, maintenance, repair or demolition of buildings, structures and equipment or similar activities. Such temporary wiring must be removed immediately upon completion of the work for which the wiring was installed.

When the temporary wiring consists of shop-made cord sets, etc., using approved parts, as permitted by 1910.305(a)(2) and 1926.405(a)(2) the requirements for listing by a nationally recognized testing laboratory do not apply.

The practice of assembling electrical extension cords is considered to be in compliance with OSHA standards provided the assembled cord sets are assembled in a manner equivalent to those that are factory-assembled and approved. Criteria for determining whether shop-made cord sets meet existing electrical standards include:

1. All components must be approved for the purpose by a nationally recognized testing laboratory (1910.303(a)) and (1926.403(a)). Individual components must be compatible for use with the other components of the completed assembly.

2. The cord set must meet all applicable requirements of 1910 Subpart S and 1926 Subpart K. For example, the assembly must be marked appropriately (1910.303(e)) and (1926.405(g)(2)(iv)); boxing intended for use in a permanent installation may not be used (1910.303(b)(1)(i) and 1926.403(b)(1)(i)); cords must be connected to devices and fittings so as to provide strain relief (1910.305(g)(2) (iii) and 1926.405(g)(2)(iv)); cords passing through holes in enclosures must be protected by bushings or fittings designed for the purpose (1926.405(g)(2)(v)- fittings designed to fasten cables to metal boxes are not acceptable); and no grounded conductor shall be attached to any terminal or lead so as to reverse designated polarity (1910.304(a)(2)) and (1926.404(a)(2)).


3. The cord set must be assembled by a qualified person.

4. The wiring of the completed assembly must be inspected by a qualified person before the cord set is used initially. For example, the following checks and tests, or equivalent, should be performed:

(a) Determine that all equipment grounding conductors are electrically continuous.

(b) Test all equipment grounding conductors for electrical continuity.

(c) Determine that each equipment grounding conductor is connected to its proper terminal.

(d) Test each receptacle and attachment plug to ensure correct attachment of the equipment grounding conductor.

If you have further questions on this matter, please contact the Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance [at (202) 693-1850].
In my opinion OSHA could ask you to produce a listing from the box manufacturer that the box is made for pendant use.

You will not get that letter with Bell boxes, they not listed for pendant use.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 272
L
Member
iwire, I was looking at the box you have pictured above. I didn't see where appleton said that they were listed. I'm not in disagreement btw....


Luke Clarke
Electrical Planner for TVA.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Luketrician, you are likely be correct. smile

All I did was find an image of a metal FS box for demonstration, that is why I said...

The box will look similar to this one

That particular box may not be listed for pendant use.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 272
L
Member
This might be the next best thing. If you are like me and can't find a box listed for pendant use. http://www.hubbellcatalog.com/wirin...772=14839&SUBMIT.x=35&SUBMIT.y=5


Luke Clarke
Electrical Planner for TVA.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 74
J
jkraft Offline OP
Member
"I disagree, you just have not run into this before"

Well I asked the inspector to quote the code that prohibits this and he said there isn't one.

Heck I even thought of taking all the KO's out and replacing them with KO seals

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5