ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 228 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 12 of 12 1 2 10 11 12
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Quote
1) He built the house on a utility easement; it just does not get any dumber than that. Would anyone here build their home on a utility easement? Just curious, lets see a show of hands.

Two different surveyors did come out one before the foundation and one after the foundation.

Both surveyors say it is not on the easement.

Quote

3) Mr. Zagami was warned repeatedly not to build on the easement by the POCO.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Debbie Drew, the spokeswoman, said Zagami built his home on National Grid’s easement and ignored its repeated warning to stop.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Means nothing, this is the same POCO that said humans have nothing to worry about when pets where getting killed on live manhole covers "Because humans do not walk around bare foot."

Quote

5) What bank in their right mind would make a home construction loan for a house built on a utility easement?

They did not, as far as the surveyors are concerned it is not on the easement.

I agree the HO bares some responsibility but as electure mentioned a ways back there is plenty of blame to go around.



[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 01-03-2007).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 348
I
ITO Offline
Member
Granted I don’t know the local rules where this house was built, but every other project I have ever been on, there is an engineered set of plans submitted for plan review from the AHJ, prior to any permits being issued. These plans have a civil drawing showing any easements that may be present. The approved plans become part of the contract documents, which any lenders on the project get a copy of as part of the lending process.

Regardless of any mistakes that make it through plan review the builder has the responsibility to ensure the building meets all local codes. If a 200A feeder is shown with #3 AWG, and somehow makes it past plan review, the builder still has to use the proper wire size for the feeder, and can not blame the inspector for failing him if he does not. “It made it past plan review” is a poor excuse for doing something wrong.


101° Rx = + /_\
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 348
I
ITO Offline
Member
Quote
Two different surveyors did come out one before the foundation and one after the foundation.

Both surveyors say it is not on the easement.

If this is the case, and he is on the easement then he may have legal grounds to sue both surveyors.


101° Rx = + /_\
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I agree.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
I can't imagine that he is not on the easement, but I also can't imagine two surveyors making the same mistake. I wonder how wide the easement is? They are working on the layout of a single 138kV line in my area and the minimum that our utility wants is 50' from the center line of the poles for their easement. I would expect that it would be wider for the 345kV lines.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
BTW some of the info I posted was based on hearsay so take it for what it is worth.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

Forgetting about the high voltage above the house it is a nosy area on summertime weekends, a lot of trail bikes, ATVs etc. [Linked Image]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 348
I
ITO Offline
Member
So two licensed and bonded surveyors messed up? There is nothing about this that smells right.


101° Rx = + /_\
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
S
Member
Some of the stories quote National Grid as saying that the driveway, water and sewer lines are on their easement, but don't say that the house is.

Nobody has said that National Grid has sent out a surveyor. Which leads me to suspect that they don't actually know whether the house is on their easement, in which case the statement reported in other stories that they are claiming the house in on the easement is either erroneous reporting or posturing by National Grid.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
S
Member
Quote
4) $360K for a 1,700 SF house? That is $211 a square foot; unless the land cost him $190k (which it probably does not since it is on a UTILITY EASMENT), I don’t buy it.
If you can’t build a house yourself for under $100 a square foot, you are doing it wrong.(Granted I am being a snob but that does not look like an expensive house to me)
I'm finishing up DIY-building a 2000 square foot addition that's bigger than his house, including a $20k kitchen, 3 bedrooms, bathroom, garage, living room, diniing room, the works- more than doubling the size of my house... for about $80k total- that's about $40/sqft for whoever's counting. And that's using quality materials and not cutting corners. No way that house cost him $360k to build if he built it himself like he claims. It might be worth $360k if it was built 100' away, but it certainly didn't cost him that to build.

Quote
Nobody has said that National Grid has sent out a surveyor.
On the one TV interview, national grid said they had an independant survey done, and he built on their easment.

[This message has been edited by SteveFehr (edited 01-03-2007).]

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
"How did that line work out for you?"

On a few occasions - pretty well - but I was a shoe in anyway by the time I got around to that.... I was a good looking guy in my 20's and could charm the stripes off a tiger.... Seem to be lacking charm and looks these days - fortunately married the last one to fall for it.

As for utility easements I have 5' of overhead 12kv in the back and 2' of the front yard is high-pressure gas down about 3' - both running the same direction the width of 28' on my lot. The only thing that bugs me is I cant put in a hot tub in the back yard as several service drop spread out from the pole out back as well - knew that when I bought the place. Both are required set-backs and can't build in them anyway due to zoning/planning. When they moved the transformer out of my yard a few months back I tried to get them to mid-span the neighbors drop - but no dice... Think I need to talk to them about thier easement, and its extent on my property as the drops are far outside the 5'....


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Page 12 of 12 1 2 10 11 12

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5