ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 381 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
#70368 10/09/06 01:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 265
S
Member
"BTW, Rowan Atkinson allias Mr Bean, is a fully qualified electrical engineer."

I can just picture him at his drafting table or computer with a turkey on his head.


Sixer

"Will it be cheaper if I drill the holes for you?"
#70369 10/09/06 02:14 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
IMO, I don't think most paints would be detrimental to a receptacle but UL doesn't seem to like the idea..

In the last question on this page UL doesn't condone it but they don't flat out say it can't be done either.

Roger




[This message has been edited by Roger (edited 10-09-2006).]

#70370 10/09/06 08:10 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
Quote
When paint is introduced onto the face of the
receptacle, the ability of the receptacle
face insulating material to resist
a potential arc across the face of
the receptacle from one contact to
another may be compromised. It is
impossible to determine the effect
paint will have on the electrical integrity
of the receptacle.

Roger, I would take that as a NO....


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
#70371 10/09/06 08:39 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
Mark, I pretty much agree, but with no more of a solid statement as an answer to the question it wouldn't hold much weight.

The problem is
Quote
may be compromised
that statemnt means it "MAY NOT" be compromised as well.

It would seem as though a "yes it would void the listing due to" or "no, it is not permissible to paint a receptacle per the listing blah, blah, blah," would be the solid statement needed to have any strength.

Roger


[This message has been edited by Roger (edited 10-09-2006).]

#70372 10/09/06 09:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
When UL says "May be", or it's twin "has not been evaluated"...that's just a fancy way of saying "we have no way of knowing.

Not all paint is alike. Nor are all receptacles. An oil / xylene based paint (such as "Rust-O-Leum") is more likely to attack a cheap plastic receptacle than a water-based latex. UL doesn't know what paints may be used, and does no tests of this sort.
Likewise, some paints have a lot of rubber solids; these probably provide decent insulation. Others have a fair amount of metal in them; I suspect that those just might conduct....

Sometimes "don't know" means nothing more, or less, than "don't know."

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5