ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 533 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 136
C
cgw Offline OP
Member
The utility has already said that they will not put in different transformers. Mostly because if they have to replace, the low impedance transformers are what they will have availible "on the shelf".
As for extra service entrance length - this is only feasible if we install a pad mount transformer outside instead of replacing the inside transformers which is not that bad of an option - BUT what would be the cost of 200 feet of a 2500 amp (or so) secondary. And we would still have a 50 year old switchgear.

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
R
Ron Offline
Member
Replace the switchgear.


Ron
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
P
Member
Ron
EXACTLY!

With the parameters set by the OP, it really seems like a new gear is going to be installed.


Pierre Belarge
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I see a few options from an installers view.

1) Replace the gear, continue as planed.

2)Do not touch the gear or the transformers, have the power co bring in a second service with it's own transformer to power the addition. (AHJ can allow it)

3)Replace the old 1600 amp gear with a new 2500 amp gear and feed both buildings from this new gear.

4)Bring the service to the addition and feed the original 50 year old gear from the additions service. This would add impedance to the circuit ahead of the old gear.

Anyway you want to go we would be happy to do the work, lots of gear and copper. [Linked Image]

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 136
C
cgw Offline OP
Member
Changing the switchgear has always been the number one option. I am just looking for any lower cost option so I can tell the owner that we looked for lower cost options. The switchgear has the 1600A MCB plus about 12 200A CBs and a few smaller CBs.
Any option that cost nearly the cost of replacing the switchgear is (IMO) not really an option as it they would still have the 50 year old switch gear.
So far the options are:
1. Replace the switchgear.
2. Current limiting fuses before the switchgear if it can be shown that the fuses will limit the let through current to less than 45K at any fault current over 45K up to the available. (I am still not sure this is an option)
3. As mentioned above, a separate service for the addition. I wonder if the utility would install a second set of transformers for the addition in the same location instead of replacing the existing with larger?

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 25
J
Member
I apologize beforehand if my question is awfully stupid, but is it not true that the circuit let through current limit will be 50000 amps (the one of the main breaker, as stated by “cgw”)?

Why is important to consider the transformer short circuit current if it is higher than the breaker one?

Regards,

Joe.-

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
S
Member
Joe,

The deal is that the "50,000 Amp" short-circuit rating of the breaker does not mean that it will limit the current to 50,000 Amps. Rather, it means that the breaker is designed to reliably open and quench the resulting arc when up to 50,000 amps is flowing through it. If there is more than 50,000 amps, the breaker may fail to open. It might never be able to quench the arc, or it might fuse solid in the closed position, or might fail through any number of other failure mechanisms.



[This message has been edited by SolarPowered (edited 04-17-2006).]

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 806
Member
Quote
...or might fail through any number of other failure mechanisms.

Which is a very gentle way of saying it could flame out big time or more likely explode, damaging the buss work and causing further chaos!!

I've seen in person the end result of this, it's not pretty!!

Somewhere here on ECN (I think it was the Photos or Violation forums..) there was a picture of what that end result looked like.
(IIRC the thread was titled "I wonder what he's thinking?")


Stupid should be painful.
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5