ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 331 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
#6274 12/29/01 10:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
required and desired are 2 different animals.
the customer is king....

#6275 12/29/01 10:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Yes Sparky they are required to be marked as such.

[Linked Image]

The information above clearly states that fact.


[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 12-29-2001).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#6276 12/30/01 08:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
Joe,
The panel in question has no label on it indicating CTL class. There is a busbar diagram depicting full size breakers only. I have seen these diagrams also depicting minis on the bottom few stabs. The question this brings up is, if there is no CTL rating, are minis allowed and how many?

#6277 12/30/01 11:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Redsy:

My take would be "NO" because the instructions you describe are specific and 110-3(b) can be cited here.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#6278 12/31/01 11:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
Joe & everyone,

Thanks & Happy New Year

#6279 12/31/01 04:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
Sorry Rojosy.
I crapped out big time on this one.
Happy New Year...S

#6280 12/31/01 07:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
electure,
No need to be sorry here. I appreciate all the input I get.

#6281 01/08/02 12:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
E
Member
This might be too little, too late, but I perused my 1999 UL Electrical Construction Equipment Directory and found a statement that might pertain to your query. On page 27 it states that: "Some breakers are not provided with a means to prevent their installation in Class CTL assemblies. These circuit breakers are for use in old style, non-Class CTL equipment and are marked 'For Replacement Use Only, not CTL Assemblies.'"
So, it might be ok to have the mini breakers if they are so marked. But,if the wafer breakers are modified in order to fit the panel bus bars, then they were illegal from the get-go and you are not permitted to add more breakers to the non-code compliant panel.
Instead of a 200 A service change, it might be feasible to do a panel change to allow more breakers..

#6282 01/08/02 12:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
Elzappr,
I noticed the breakers you mentioned at the local sell-all supply house. In this case, the issue at hand would still be that installing these minis would allow more than 42 OC devices in this panel.
Interestiingly enough, I found another one last night. A 40 space ITE panel that had about 12 minis installed. Total count= 46 OC devices. These "cheater" breakers do not have the rejection feature that most minis have.

#6283 01/08/02 06:11 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
this might sound a tad lame, but if it's a 40 cir panel, shouldn't it automatically be a CTL ?
[Linked Image]

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5