ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 265 guests, and 15 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#58181 11/01/05 09:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
250.122(B) requires EGCs to be increased proportionally when circuit conductors are increased for voltage drop.
So, although a #10 EGC is good enough for up to a 60 amp ckt., per Table 250.122, if you run a particularly long, 20-amp ckt. and increase the ungrounded conductors to, say #8, you will need to increase the EGC to #8 also.
Any comments, please?

#58182 11/01/05 10:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
You summed it up nicely.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#58183 11/01/05 10:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
I'm wondering why a #10 ground is good enough for a 60-amp ckt with #6 circuit conductors, but not good enough for a 20-amp ckt. with #8 circuit conductors.

#58184 11/02/05 12:59 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
P
Member
Effective Ground Fault Current Path


Pierre Belarge
#58185 11/02/05 07:55 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
PCB,

If #10 is effective for a 60 amp OCPD, why not for a 20 amp OCPD. I don't believe that the increased resistance due to length will inhibit the operation of the CB.
And if the EGC and circuit conductors need to be matched in size for some concept related to balanced, or equal impedances between circuit conductors and EGCs, why can the EGC be smaller than the circuit conductors in circuits above 30-amp?

#58186 11/02/05 08:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Redsy,
How would you write the rule? The EGC does have to increase with the size of the ungrounded conductors, and I don't know of a way to write a rule to accomplish this other than how it is currently written. If you do, it is not too late to submit an online proposal .
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
#58187 11/02/05 08:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
Thanks, guys.

I am just wondering if there is some kind of theoretical concept that I am overlooking?

#58188 11/02/05 12:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
C
C-H Offline
Member
From a theoretical point of view you want the impedance of the PCBelarge's effective ground fault current path to be low enough to trip the breaker within a reasonable time.

If the 20A breaker is designed to be very forgiving to momentary surges in current while the 60A breaker so to speak is "trigger happy", you could get this counterintuitive result. The breaker manufacturers or their websites can no doubt tell.

[This message has been edited by C-H (edited 11-02-2005).]

[This message has been edited by C-H (edited 11-02-2005).]

#58189 11/02/05 12:50 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
I understand the concept but the reality is 2000 feet of #12 would still trip a 20a breaker with a bolted fault, even if it takes 150% (30a) to operate it.


Greg Fretwell
#58190 11/02/05 02:10 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 178
J
Member
gfretwell: Yes, the breaker would trip. But in the meantime, the voltage at the point of fault would be higher than if the EGC was sized per the rule, so the shock threat is greater.

Redsy: I know it sounds inconsistent, but I don't think it is. Remember, the reason the EGC was sized up was the long run. If that 60 amp circuit was the same length, it would need a #4 EGC.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5