ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 468 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#55463 08/30/05 06:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 71
S
Member
What is the reason for not putting a breaker directly accross from the main? The city managment group I'm contracting for want me to label the main as #1 and accross from it #2. I told them #1 starts below the main.

#55464 08/30/05 07:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
If the main is a back fed device that plugs onto the bus, there is usually a limitation to the total amps of breakers connected to any one stab.

If the main breaker is plugged into a space that would normally be occupied by a branch breaker, I see no problem marking it as #1 and identifying it on the panel schedule as a main breaker. IMO, it would need to be identified anyhow to comply with 110.22.

Tom

[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 08-30-2005).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
#55465 08/30/05 11:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
L
Member
If you think about it, it seems that the best practice would be to place the highest-rated branch device on the same lugs as the backfed main. This would minimize the current passing from the main's lugs to the buses.


(Maybe it's better to not think about it.)


Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5