ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (gfretwell), 32 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#53384 06/22/05 10:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 21
V
VOLTS Offline OP
Member
What are the difference between IMC & RMC. I have an electrical contractor telling me there is no difference. I have always spec'd RMC in an explosion proof area. I know the Code states IMC is legal, But I was always taught RMC was stronger and had better grounding of interferance for control circuits using 4-20ma. I would like to stay with RMC what would be a good argument not to use IMC?

#53385 06/22/05 10:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
IMC is less expensive and can be used in all areas that RMC can be used. I am also told that it is stronger, but I have never read anything on that. IMC also has a bigger cross sectional area and is easier to bend.

I would not install RMC unless I was forced to.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#53386 06/22/05 11:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 615
J
Member
I have always found IMC much stiffer and more difficult to bend. I always opt for RMC because it is easier to bend.

#53387 06/22/05 11:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
Really? I haven't bent either of them in about 6 years or so, so I might not be remembering properly. [Linked Image]


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#53388 06/22/05 11:43 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
IMC has a thinner wall, and more tempered/stiffer, not sure why.

RMC is slightly thicker, weighs more, less tempered, but seemingly about the same to bend. Costs a penny more.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
#53389 06/23/05 01:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
I agree that IMC is much stiffer and harder to bend and thead than RMC. I have also seen problems with the IMC breaking at the threads on the 1/2 and 3/4" size. This is caused by the reduced wall thickness of this conduit. There is very little strength left after you cut the threads.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
#53390 06/23/05 10:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
I used a fair amount of IMC and GRC in hazardous locations including 4-20 mA control circuits and VFDs. Never noticed a diffrence in EMI or RFI problems in one over the other.
Although lighter in weight the IMC was indeed harder to bend, and keeping the shoe tight against the pipe for an accurate radius was difficult even at the 3/4" size. I would avoid using it for hand bending.

#53391 06/24/05 11:39 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
From an RF standpoint a wrap of properly grounded metal window screen is as effective as RMC. The difference is physical protection.


Greg Fretwell
#53392 06/24/05 02:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 21
V
VOLTS Offline OP
Member
Thanks for the feed back.

#53393 06/24/05 08:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 680
W
Member
I prefer working with IMC, lighter and easier to bend IMHO. Never had a problem with it breaking underground and Maine frost can break anything. My suppliers don't stock it anymore though so I use RMC all the time now anyway. What are people paying for 3/4 rigid, last time I checked it was 17 bucks a stick up here??

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5