ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 228 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#4366 09/21/01 02:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
Hi Scott:

Yes, I certainly agree that it's almost always easy to not work live if at all possible.

We don't normally have splices in a receptacle box. The wires are all connected in the socket's terminals, so a live replacement is not usually practical, unless it's the end of a cable run.

The wires MAY have been securely twisted together before being clamped in the terminals, but it's usually impossible to see until the screw is loosened.

#4367 09/22/01 07:58 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
N
Member
Replacing recepticle when hot happens a lot.
Most businesses donot want to have a circuit down when the are open. Also i have had jerks remove a tag out and turn on a breaker when thier power was off. I usually just use hot work gloves and replace it hot. Sure do get funny looks but no interuptions when doing that.


ed
#4368 09/23/01 12:00 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19
D
Member
Highly recomend pigtailing when possible and demand it on split feeds . example (residentual 14-3 feed to a 2 gang recepticle box grounded conductor shared between the 2 circuits). Does anyone still call the grounded conductor a neutral...drives me nuts!


| )ubli| |
#4369 09/23/01 12:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 142
B
Member
Quote
Originally posted by DUBLIN:
Highly recomend pigtailing when possible and demand it on split feeds . example (residentual 14-3 feed to a 2 gang recepticle box grounded conductor shared between the 2 circuits). Does anyone still call the grounded conductor a neutral...drives me nuts!

The three wire-edison you just described, does indeed have a neutral, by definition, the neutral conductor has equal potential between IT and all of the ungrounded conductors. This would include 120/240,and a 14-3/wGr would fit the definition of a neutral. 120/208, however a 4-wire Delta with a high leg would not have a neutral, because all ungrounded measured to the' grounded conductor' are not equal.

#4370 09/23/01 12:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Quote
120/208, however a 4-wire Delta with a high leg would not have a neutral, because all ungrounded measured to the' grounded conductor' are not equal.

A 4 wire delta with a high leg is a 120/240 volt system. A 120/208 is a 4 wire wye that does have a neutral.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#4371 09/23/01 04:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
The IEE in Britain defines a neutral as an earthed (grounded) conductor which is intended to carry current during the normal functioning of equipment.

Dublin: What exactly don't you like about the term NEUTRAL?

#4372 09/23/01 05:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 142
B
Member
Quote
Originally posted by resqcapt19:
A 4 wire delta with a high leg is a 120/240 volt system. A 120/208 is a 4 wire wye that does have a neutral.
Don(resqcapt19)

I said the 4-wire 120/208 certainly does have a neutral you obviously , missed the comma, I used 120/240 and 120/208 as systems that have a neutral, he said a 14-3 wire is a grounded conductor, and not a neutral, I said a 3-Wire Edison cetainly has a neutral. Then I said a 4-wire DELTA does not have a neutral if you go by definition, because of the high-leg 208 to ground. The definition says all voltages measured from the grounded conductor to the ungrounded conducctor are equal Then its a NEUTRAL.

#4373 09/23/01 06:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
bordew,
Your sentence starts out with "120/208," and it really makes no sense as written. It appears to be implying that a 120/208 circuit is a delta. Sorry if I read it wrong.

Where did you find the definition of a "neutral"? It has been a subject of major debates on a number of forums and even the CMP could not aggree on a definition to be included in the NEC.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#4374 09/23/01 06:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 142
B
Member
Quote
Originally posted by resqcapt19:
bordew,
Your sentence starts out with "120/208," and it really makes no sense as written. It appears to be implying that a 120/208 circuit is a delta. Sorry if I read it wrong.

Where did you find the definition of a "neutral"? It has been a subject of major debates on a number of forums and even the CMP could not aggree on a definition to be included in the NEC.
Don(resqcapt19)

Sorry if it was confusing,and after rereading it I was confused, too many fragmented sentences, Ha ha,
The definition came from Mike Holts book on Understanding the NEC. Oft hand I can only think of two balanced systems, in name only, the Edison 3-wire and 120/208 wye, non-linear loads notwithstanding, at receptacle voltages.

#4375 09/23/01 07:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
This definition closely resembles that of a multi-wire ckt.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5