ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 518 guests, and 38 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#3028 08/03/01 02:33 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
The quick answer is: Yes all conductors may be sized based on their insulation rating. De-rating factors need to be considered, and the terminations MUST be rated for the final temperature.

For example - There are no overcurrent protective devices that are rated for termination of conductors sized per the 90 deg C column. The lug is not the limiting factor, changing to a higher lug will not increase the rating of the complete device.

#3029 08/03/01 02:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 93
M
Member
I can only think of one example where a wire could actually be loaded to its 90 C rating, but I doubt very much if it would pay to do it except maybe on extremely long runs.

You could size the wire between two junction boxes to the 90 degree rating if the slices (kerneys, crimps etc.) are rated for 90C, and then size the wire at each end of this run using the 75 degree column.

Matt

#3030 08/03/01 03:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Matt,
If everything in the circuit including the equipment is listed for use at 75°C, then yes we could use the 75°C ampacity forom the table.

In the long term, it would never pay to run a 90°C conductor at its full ampacity between junction boxes, do to the increase in energy costs to heat that wire to 90°C.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#3031 08/03/01 04:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 93
M
Member
Don,

I agree, that it would seldom if ever pay, but it would be legal. However, I don't quite understand what you're getting at when you make the statement "do to the increase in energy costs to heat that wire to 90°C." Heat the wire? LOL

Matt

#3032 08/03/01 06:50 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Matt,
It takes energy to heat the wire. This costs money. If you have any circuit that runs 4,000 or more hours in a year and is loaded to near the conductors ampacity, it often makes economic sense to install a conductor one or two sizes larger. The smaller wire size has a higher resistance and creates more heat and wastes more energy then the larger wire does at the same load.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#3033 08/03/01 07:03 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
>Heat the wire?
Yes, seriously. The heating of the wire comes about because the cmil cross-section is heavily utilized. Think of the effort it takes to breathe through a soda straw. The larger your conductive pathway, the lower the resistance, and the less loss you have to heating. 90°C means just that. The conductor can heat to that temperature carrying that many amps.

Try running 50 amps through a #14 sometime (Be sure to use heavier wire at both ends before connecting to anything you can't throw away when your test is over). It will get quite hot, might even make water sizzle.

#3034 08/03/01 07:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 93
M
Member
OK guys, I understand all that. It just sounded funny worded that way.

Matt

#3035 08/03/01 07:55 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
This is one reason that I rarely use 14 AWG wire - especially to power anything other than solid state electronics.

Derating probably is less costly than many folks think.

#3036 08/03/01 08:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Here's a page on wire size and Energy efficiency from the Copper Development assn.

Wire Size Up\"


Bill


Bill
#3037 08/03/01 08:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Bill;
Note all calc's are for industrial distances and constant loads.

Is it purely for economical reasons?

oh yes...but who's is my Q [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 08-03-2001).]

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5