ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 255 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#28173 08/12/03 04:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 745
M
mamills Offline OP
Member
Hi Guys (and ladies, of course): I need a little learnin' here. A church in this area is undergoing a service upgrade. There are four separate raceways being installed to provide a three phase service. Each one, equipped with weatherhead, travels along the back side of the church building for a distance of about 50 feet before elbowing through the wall into a switchgear room. So far, the conductors for the three hot legs (color-coded black, red and blue - three conductors per leg) have been pulled into the conduits. However, unlike what I've read, and seen discussed here previously, all three black legs are in one conduit, all three reds in another, and all three blues in the third (instead of one of each appearing in each conduit). The fourth conduit is empty at present - I assume that the "neutral" is supposed to go here.

I thought that this was strictly a NO-NO, and serious problems could result from this. Can y'all elaborate on this for me?

Mike (mamills)

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
.

[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 08-12-2003).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I have done similar installations underground but I do not believe you can do this aboveground look at the one exception for Paralleled Installations.

[quote]300.3 Conductors.

(B) Conductors of the Same Circuit. All conductors of the same circuit and, where used, the grounded conductor and all equipment grounding conductors and bonding conductors shall be contained within the same raceway, auxiliary gutter, cable tray, cablebus assembly, trench, cable, or cord, unless otherwise permitted in accordance with 300.3(B)(1) through (4).

(1) Paralleled Installations. Conductors shall be permitted to be run in parallel in accordance with the provisions of 310.4. The requirement to run all circuit conductors within the same raceway, auxiliary gutter, cable tray, trench, cable, or cord shall apply separately to each portion of the paralleled installation, and the equipment grounding conductors shall comply with the provisions of 250.122. Parallel runs in cable tray shall comply with the provisions of 392.8(D).

Exception: Conductors installed in nonmetallic raceways run underground shall be permitted to be arranged as isolated phase installations. The raceways shall be installed in close proximity, and the conductors shall comply with the provisions of 300.20(B).

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Mike,
What are raceways made of?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 745
M
mamills Offline OP
Member
Don;
They appear to be rigid steel pipe with threaded fittings. I'm guessing they are about 3 1/2 - 4" diameter.

Mike (mamills

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Don would you be able to apply 300.3(B)(3) to a paralleled installation.


Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 914
E
Member
I haven't personally seen an installation like this, but someone I know told me of a serious heat problem caused by the situation you described. Perhaps someone can elaborate on possible complications.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
P
Member
Bob

I would say based on 300.3(B)(1)exception, that the above installation is a violation, and it will definitely cause a heating of the conduit problem. Possibly causing a fire.
300.3(B)(3) does not pertain to paralleled installations.
Even if they had run PVC above grade, that is a violation.
I understand why some like to install a parallel service this way, it makes working with the conductors easier.

Pierre


Pierre Belarge
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 324
A
Member
All i can say is stand back when they throw the main. Due to the magnetic field produced from the flow of electrons, you DO NOT want to install all the same phase conductors in there own pipe. I know a company that did that on a Kwickset factory not far from me. Blew the concrete wall off the back of the building. That was their first and last big job.

[This message has been edited by arseegee (edited 08-12-2003).]

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Bob,
In my opinion 300.3(B)(3)would permit this installtion if the raceways were nonferous. Note that you would have to comply with 300.20(B) where the conductors enter the panel. If these are ferous raceways, then the installation is a code violation and will fail very quickly when any load is applied.

Pierre,
I see nothing in 300.3(B)(3) that says you can't use the section for parallel installations.

Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5