ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 390 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#22167 02/19/03 01:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2
M
Mel R Offline OP
Junior Member
In the 1996 NEC, 384-13 General, the last sentence read :All panelboard circuits and circuit modification shall be legibly identified as to the purpose or use on a circuit directory located on the face or inside of the panel doors". This sentence does not appear in the 2002 NEC, 408.13 General.

Currently we identify on the receptacle what panelbox and circuit breaker(s) feed the receptacle. Therefore the directory in the panel box is blank. This done because workstations and equipment can be easily re-located and eliminates the constant need to update the directory. Is this practice considered acceptable?

#22168 02/19/03 03:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
E
Member
Try looking in 408.4 in the 2002 Code.
"All circuits and circuit modifications shall be legibly identified as to purpose or use on a circuit directory located on the face or inside of the panel door in the case of a panelboard, and at each switch on a switchboard."

#22169 02/19/03 07:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Mel R:
Not to be a hardnose, but if your panels are not "marked" you will fail inspection.
408-4 NEC as ststed in the previous post.
John


John
#22170 02/19/03 08:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 67
P
Member
hotline,elzapr,
i want em identified to final. section 110-22 compliments 408.4.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5