ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
UL 508A SPACING
by ale348 - 03/29/24 01:09 AM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (ale348), 302 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 787
L
LarryC Offline OP
Member
Electrical Engineer here. I have had this discussion at work and am trying to wrap my head around it.

Design and build custom machinery for sale in North America. Use the NEC as a basic guideline for sizing conductors and overcurrent protection. Using fine stranded large gauge conductors for power distribution to certain loads. High stand count cable is desired for flexibility during installation and service. Standard crimp lugs are not UL listed for high strand count conductors. Have been using them in this application for years with no history of problems.

Question is: Where does the NEC _REQUIREMENTS_ stop? I say the NEC stops at the system disconnect. Everything past that is the machinery manufacturer's decision.

Another example: RG 175 is UL listed for 35 V. We routinely run 800-1000 VDC thru it for X-Ray detectors. Catalog lists it for use up to 1000V. Are we violating the NEC?

Thanks

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
From a practical sense, do you need a permit to install this? Is it cord and plug connected?


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 206
G
Member
If it were Europe the manufactured equipment would be covered by a whole range of technical standards, covering safety, emc, ergonomics, etc and would be certified by its maker against these, with no reference to building standards other than the required supply.
I would be surprised if it was much different on your side of the water. Certainly USA manufactured gear imported to UK has worked like this.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
LarryC:

IMHO, the inspection process on MCCs (Control Cabinets) "stops" at the feeder.

"Equipment" that is remote from the MCC requires NEC conformance as to the wiring methods and OCP.

The 'interior' of the MCC is the responsibility of the mfg. and MUST have listing/label from a NRTL.

I assume your equipment has a NRTL listing/label, so if they are OK with the crimp terminations and FS conductors, that would be OK with me.



John
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
Larry, if the equipment is maunfactured in "an engineered controlled environment", then the NEC does not apply. The NEC is for new construction. All electrical equipment must be listed OR approved. Listing is not required for custom built equipment however the customer may require it if local ordinance does not. In your case, NEC 409, 725, and NFPA 79? may be applicable. Others may apply as well

Last edited by sparkyinak; 12/29/16 04:45 AM.

"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
Once all of the building permits are closed you will be dealing with the Fire/Life Safety officer and YMMV about how closely they are looking at installed equipment. I agree with John, having a NRTL sticker on it will pretty much make further inspection go away unless there is a fire. Repairing and modifying a listed box may have some legal ramifications but I have not seen it in real life. The lawyers told us we could not legally change a plug cap on a line cord (listing issues) but we still had a part number and we could order them.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
Lawyers..... humph!


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 787
L
LarryC Offline OP
Member
All,

The type of equipment I am talking about is large capital equipment. It may have multiple power sources, it may be in several rooms, it may be outside. It may be for medical use, facility security, or factory automated manufacturing. I am just trying to understand where one set of requirements stop and the next set begin.

I'm looking for the equivalent of the demarcation point that separates the phone company equipment from the building's equipment.

Quote
If the equipment is manufactured in "an engineered controlled environment", then the NEC does not apply.


I interpret that to mean, If we design and build it, and then oversee the installation of it in your facility, the NEC applies up to the Main disconnect(s) and everything past that falls on the machine designer/builder.

If there are multiple equipment cabinets connected to sub assemblies and each other, by cables laying in dedicated cable trays, are the cables subject to NEC requirements too? The power flowing thru the cable tray cables come from power supplies that are downstream of the disconnects.

Thanks for all of the replies so far.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
This will get back to what the fire/life safety officer wants to see. Some may want to see a NRTL certification on large fixed in place equipment.

BTW since you mentioned phone equipment, remember they get a break on 90.2(B)(4)
Quote
(4) Installations of communications equipment under the exclusive control of communications utilities located outdoors or in building spaces used exclusively for such installations


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Larry:
The second part of your reply basically falls into the following scenario:

Cabling from one piece of equipment to other equipment of the same system, in trays, would require 'listed' trays, bonding, and cabling. The methods and materials used to terminate cabling may have a 'look' by an inspector. IF the cabling is 'plug & play' type, I would just give it a glance, as it would be out of the NEC boundries.

Please note that the opinions herein are my personal opinions, based on guidelines within the NJ UCC, and may be different in other jurisdictions.

A 'short' wording of the regs is 'process equipment stops at the disconnects of the feeder at the equipment, and the fees imposed are only for the feeder and disconnect if it is NOT within the equipment. However ALL 'parts' of said system that are hard wired (NEC) are required to be within the permit app, and appropriate fees and inspections are required. (My words and not a direct quote)

Determination within my jurisdiction is part of the plan review, release, and permit issuing process.


John
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5