ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
Old decora style outlets
by Admin. 03/25/17 11:40 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,643 Are you busy
166,541 Re: Forum
160,728 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 81 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#216947 - 03/18/16 02:51 PM 110.26(E)  
triple  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
Wisconsin
Since most large switchboards placed along a wall tend to be positioned at least a few inches off/away from said wall, does the code allow foreign equipment to be mounted within this gap and under 6' above the electrical equipment? Tecnically, nothing placed within this gap would be within the "footprint" of the gear. Obviously, at some point, the gap does become large enough for other trades to use. Is it one inch, three inches, one foot? Can the AHJ say that even 18" isn't enough?


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#216948 - 03/18/16 04:12 PM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]  
ghost307  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 900
Chicago Illinois USA
Check with your AHJ.
I know that although Chicago says no (because they prohibit foreign items within the footprint and the associated working space); it is allowed in other cities.


Ghost307

#216954 - 03/19/16 01:37 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]  
triple  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
Wisconsin
The working space is only in front of the type of equipment I am referring to. For equipment requiring working space behind it, the unit would not be allowed to be placed up against a wall. Sorry, I don't think I described the situation very clearly.


#216956 - 03/19/16 12:10 PM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]  
ghost307  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 900
Chicago Illinois USA
I really think the AHJ needs to weigh in on this.
A drain line behind the equipment will cause few problems, a water line could sweat or break, a gas line is a hazard next to electrical equipment.
You also have to consider how you would repair/replace something that is rendered inaccessible after installation.
The 2 of you need to go over the specifics of this installation...I doubt that there is a universal answer to this.


Ghost307

#216957 - 03/19/16 01:53 PM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]  
triple  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
Wisconsin
1) The area I am referring to is above the equipment, within six feet vertically of its top, but behind the footprint. If the equipment were 6' from the wall instead of 4" then there would definately be no problem with anything foreign being installed there.
2) Nothing is rendered inaccessible. Again, I must not have described the scenario well. Nothing has been placed directly behind the switchgear. It it above but behind the footprint.


#216970 - 03/21/16 09:34 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]  
ampherder  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 19
VA
The way 110.26(E) is worded, there would be nothing prohibiting what you describe. The AHJ can always choose to rule differently.


#216976 - 03/22/16 09:57 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]  
HotLine1  Online Content


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,803
Brick, NJ USA
IMHO, it would depend on the proposed 'foreign' item is. Any 'item' that may 'leak' or cause any type of damage to the gear would be a "No", unless protection of the gear could be maintained.

The best solution to your inquiry would be a discussion with the local AHJ.


John

#216977 - 03/22/16 10:57 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]  
ghost307  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 900
Chicago Illinois USA
Agreed.
I had a major switchgear installation where the Contractor took a short cut and routed the incoming natural gas line over the gear.
His response to the AHJ's objection was to put a drip pan underneath the gas pipe.

As the old adage goes...you can't fix stupid.


Ghost307


Member Spotlight
AllClear
AllClear
Belmond Iowa US
Posts: 44
Joined: August 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7909 MB (Peak: 0.9532 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-28 15:58:20 UTC