ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 458 guests, and 9 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by Tesla
I've never seen any cut sheet that explained the physics of E & B fields.
I was not asking for this nor would I expect it.

Quote
“Failure to install CT's in the correct orientation and on the correct phase will lead to inaccurate meter readings...”


A warning about incorrect readings would not normally mean be construed to be a warning about equipment failure due to overheating.

I asked for installation instructions from any CT manufacturer that provided a warning that CTs should not be mounted 'near' a 90² turn in the conductor.

Your reply was that this is a topic that is evidently only presented in the deepest E & B field theory discussions.

Quote
The CT's that lack shielding are plainly dimensioned for plain vanilla bus bars – rising vertically – in CT sections.


Your lack of field experience (outside the world of utilities or academia) is very evident. The CTs I used as an example are intended to be mounted around the cables in the wiring gutter of panelboards.

Last edited by JBD; 02/13/14 02:16 PM.
JBD #212789 02/13/14 06:33 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
The unshielded CTs in the pdf you cited are as I described.

The CTs suitable for use around cables are as I described.

Again, from the pdf you cited.

B fields induce E fields when they are changing.

The photo shows a badly behaving CT attempt that goes largely against the assurances you're providing.

Telling us it can't be happening is not helpful.

Lacking any further postings from the OP, I can't be sure of much... other than this is a fouled up install.

The goo on the floor certainly looks like it was melted down from the rigged up CT.

Please opine as to what you think is the cause.


Tesla
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
I still think the mess is from a sloppy install. I doubt enough heat could build from the neutral buss or what appears to be a fabricated CT.

There appears to be some scorching on the phase buss alhgso.

Looks like the OP is a 'hit n' run' guy.



John
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by Tesla
Telling us it can't be happening is not helpful....

Please opine as to what you think is the cause.


I have not said something is not happening.

I said it is common industry practice to have CTs near 90² bends in conductors. I also said that many if not most CTs are not shielded. The predominant number of CTs are not installed in 'vertically oriented CT cabinets'.

I have simply asked you to provide any published instructions that would have warned an installer not to put this CT where it is due to possible overheating.

In my first post, I said this CT should immediately be removed from service.



I did find one set of warnings for mounting of zero sequence rectangular CT, but it relates to nusiance tripping of GF relays.

Page 13
http://www.electricalmanuals.net/files/RELAYS/I-GARD/MGFR/C-700.pdf

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Bump
What happened to the OP??



John
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member

His last visit here was the day he made the post.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Sure would be nice to have some additional info!


John
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5