1 members (Scott35),
222
guests, and
11
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
OP
Member
|
When did redundant grounding become an NEC requirement in patient care areas?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382 Likes: 7
Member
|
The term is within the 1975 NEC, that's as far back as I can go.
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
OP
Member
|
Thank you. The exam rooms in the clinic I am working on now were wired with smurf tube (I think in '86). I found it hard to believe that met the code of the time. Just to be clear, are you saying the requirement back at least to '75 was for patient care areas to use a wiring method incorporating a conduit/sheithing that doubles as a ground?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382 Likes: 7
Member
|
Triple:
I did not read all of 517 from the '75 NEC, but the term redundant grounding is in there for sure.
To the best of my knowledge, that is how I took it on a quick read, regarding patient care areas.
What I have seen in some 'clinics' and Dr Offices is 'renovations' of 'office space' into patient care or treatment rooms; done without permits & inspections.
Someone else may have some additional info??
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931 Likes: 34
Member
|
I didn't read the whole thing but I see a reference to a common bonding point in the 75 (copper bus etc) I was wondering if that was the predecessor to the redundant ground in a metal wiring method we have now.
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382 Likes: 7
Member
|
Greg: I saw the term 'redundant ground', and I also did not have the time to read thru.
There is mention of an insulated EGC, and metalic raceway/cable.
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445 Likes: 3
Cat Servant Member
|
You're asking the wrong question. A better question would be 'when did the concept of 'patient care areas' get expanded so?'
The whole point of the original patient care area rules was to codify what had already become standard practice in areas where explosive anesthetic gasses were used; you didn't want a static charge to build up anywhere.
As an example, an 'oral surgeon' would probably need Article 517 practices in his operating area, while a dentist would not see the need.
Since then, we've lost sight of this. We've expanded 'patient care area' practically to the parking lot, while medicine has nearly completely got away from chloroform, ether, and the other explosive gasses.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382 Likes: 7
Member
|
Reno:
Other than the medical gases you mention, some which may still be used, another more important reason (IMHO) is to prevent any shock hazard to the patient.
The ever expanding use of electronic equipment in patient care areas is much more present today, then 30 years back.
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
OP
Member
|
I am not concerned about anesthesia locations. That doesn't apply in my situation. Perhaps the code first applied only to those locations (they have their own section today) but now the Handbook describes other scenarios as well. Essentially, any electrical equipment that a patient by him/herself or though an attendee could be contacted needs redundant grounding. Am I correct in my belief that the electrical panels feeding patient care areas, do not need such redundant grounding? In other words, can they not be fed with PVC pipe or any other non-grounding conduit?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382 Likes: 7
Member
|
Trip: In your clinic, the answer is you are correct for the panel feeders.
John
|
|
|
Posts: 46
Joined: March 2013
|
|
|
|